The question is easy. Is there any successful possession style tactic?
In my opinion, it is very difficult, to get at least 60-65% possession per game. With the OP tactics from fm-arena, I had games against the 18th and had 30-35% possession.
Is there any good tactic? I try to adapt (in game tactic) of Arsenal or Manchester City, but it does not work. In attachment, you see 2 examples.
Furthermore, if I choose "much shorter" passing, is that like time-wasting?
sponsorkindest said: Nice, we are doing -5 attribute testing, this proves beyond doubt that passing is a shit attribute and a value more than 8 or 9 should perform as good as a value of 16 to 19. Expand
I am not sure about that. Maybe passing is "relevant" and strong when it is combined with technique and vision. So passing gets value when the player also has a high technique and vision rating.
Is there any test with other tactics? So what if we lower the (passing) tempo to very slow (possession play of style) XOR lower pressing, disable counterattack. Will be pace or physics still be that "strong(er)"?
In my opinion, it is very difficult, to get at least 60-65% possession per game. With the OP tactics from fm-arena, I had games against the 18th and had 30-35% possession.
Is there any good tactic? I try to adapt (in game tactic) of Arsenal or Manchester City, but it does not work. In attachment, you see 2 examples.
Furthermore, if I choose "much shorter" passing, is that like time-wasting?
I am not sure about that.
Maybe passing is "relevant" and strong when it is combined with technique and vision.
So passing gets value when the player also has a high technique and vision rating.
That's why no real possession focused play style works "really" good in FM.
Pace/Acc on its own, pushes the result by 20 points. Decisions does not. That's what I meant.
So what if we lower the (passing) tempo to very slow (possession play of style) XOR lower pressing, disable counterattack. Will be pace or physics still be that "strong(er)"?
Tbh I get a bit "desperate", because such a formation is broken in FM.
I don't know any successfully team in the world, playing with such a formation.
Using three real classic "9"?
Apart from that, there are not many known defensive wingers in a 4-*-* tactic.
Nevertheless great work!
Solid 4-3-3 (4-1-2-3), with standard counter-press, counter and much more often pressing.