The Machine Learning weights never felt right to me. I always felt they underrated physicals. On average they put less weight on Acceleration, Agility, Strength, and Jumping to just the default CA weights. By comparison they put a lot more emphases on Aggression, Bravery, Work Rate, and Dribbling.
On average they put about 15% of the total score to pace and acceleration. I'm not sure what the correct percentage would be, but my guess is it might be 30-40 depending on the position.
Yarema said: What do you think all of those do? They all heavily favor pace and acceleration, some of them because of these exact tests. Expand
I've compared a lot of the ratings types and they don't really favor pace and acceleration at all. Most of them are about the same as CA in terms of rating Pace/Acceleration. I have the Machine Learning ratings on hand but those ratings tend to favor work rate, dribbling, determination, passing, and downplay decisions, agility, strength, tackling, and positioning.
I'll compare the normal genie scout ratings and maybe squirrel's ratings, but I'm pretty sure they end up being similar. None of them are outrageously weighting pace.
On average they put about 15% of the total score to pace and acceleration. I'm not sure what the correct percentage would be, but my guess is it might be 30-40 depending on the position.
I've compared a lot of the ratings types and they don't really favor pace and acceleration at all. Most of them are about the same as CA in terms of rating Pace/Acceleration. I have the Machine Learning ratings on hand but those ratings tend to favor work rate, dribbling, determination, passing, and downplay decisions, agility, strength, tackling, and positioning.
I'll compare the normal genie scout ratings and maybe squirrel's ratings, but I'm pretty sure they end up being similar. None of them are outrageously weighting pace.