GeorgeFloydOverdosed said: Not that familiar with FM Match Labs, but I think they change everything up to balance things right? So it will make the ratings less accurate, but not by that much. The main things being considered are performance and CA cost, and the training bonuses/penalties I've treated as the strawberry on top.
Honestly, I'm thinking of doing another redo from scratch that will use a more grounded method that I can present more clearly and transparently. Expand
GeorgeFloydOverdosed said: Assuming you're assessing for DR position, then the main attributes for DR are pace, acc, drib, jump, bal, injury, str, concentration.
So at a glance they look fairly even, trading 3 points of pace/acc for ~13 points of ~30% valued other attributes. Not to mention Martim is doing it with 8% less CA cost, but this isn't part of the rating, just one of the goals.
I agree with you though that at a glance, it wasn't obvious that Martim was as good as Baio, but the math seems to check out.
Keep in mind that 'blended' devalues pace/acc a bit compared to other attributes, because it's imbued with the expectation that over ~4 years of training, pace/acc will grow but technicals/mentals will stagnate/decline. But even if you use the 'performance' file, they will probably still be near even given the math above.
I know I'm blathering too much, but I would also like to say that my old file values pace/acc more, but I simply had to accept what HarvestGreen's results are showing. Based on my 1 CA tests, I don't see evidence for balance and strength being worth ~30% weighting, but his results have always ended up being on the money so I decided to accept and include it. Expand
thank you very much for the answer.
If i understand it right, with this new file the attributes of acceleration and speed are not as valued, also taking into account the issue of training and possible growth. However, I am using the fm match lab training file, will it have an impact on the development of speed and acceleration and therefore will this have an effect on this ratings?
Avenger22 said: Skin is Mustermann Iconic you can google and find it in FMScout and other places too, but it has no attributes so there is divided into 4 categories and there is no attribute atlernative to this skin Expand
CBP87 said: Yeah mate, overwrite the previous saved file or create a new one then in newgan manager, rather than use preserve, use generate Expand
Thank you, so i can do it both ways, just have to select the new file on the RT File (on the newgan software), and then do the xml config thing. Is that it?
Just a quick question if someone can help me. I'm in the second season and i want to replace the faces like i did in the previous season, but i have a doubt. When i'm doing the print screen of the regens on the shortlist, i'm i supposed to overwrite the previous word file or to create a new one with a diferent name?
the blended one right?
Honestly, I'm thinking of doing another redo from scratch that will use a more grounded method that I can present more clearly and transparently.
thank you
at this point do you think this is the best one?
Baio vs Martim:
16 acc > 14
15 pace > 14
11 drib < 14
10 jump < 12
13 bal < 15
11 inj < 7
11 str | 11
12 con < 13
So at a glance they look fairly even, trading 3 points of pace/acc for ~13 points of ~30% valued other attributes. Not to mention Martim is doing it with 8% less CA cost, but this isn't part of the rating, just one of the goals.
I agree with you though that at a glance, it wasn't obvious that Martim was as good as Baio, but the math seems to check out.
Keep in mind that 'blended' devalues pace/acc a bit compared to other attributes, because it's imbued with the expectation that over ~4 years of training, pace/acc will grow but technicals/mentals will stagnate/decline. But even if you use the 'performance' file, they will probably still be near even given the math above.
I know I'm blathering too much, but I would also like to say that my old file values pace/acc more, but I simply had to accept what HarvestGreen's results are showing. Based on my 1 CA tests, I don't see evidence for balance and strength being worth ~30% weighting, but his results have always ended up being on the money so I decided to accept and include it.
thank you very much for the answer.
If i understand it right, with this new file the attributes of acceleration and speed are not as valued, also taking into account the issue of training and possible growth. However, I am using the fm match lab training file, will it have an impact on the development of speed and acceleration and therefore will this have an effect on this ratings?
I hope you can understand my question
Based on the physical side always assumed it would be the other way around.
thank you
Thank you again.
Thank you, so i can do it both ways, just have to select the new file on the RT File (on the newgan software), and then do the xml config thing. Is that it?