IDGamer310 said: I have a question, my Last fm was 12 and now 24, to the ratin tables I saw that Fm 20/21 have win rate 73% and the Last ones only reach 55%... This % it's Because of the game it's now more dificult or the testing is more acaurate? The crazy tatics in fm 20 and 21 are tenting me to explore... Expand
mmigueis said: Do you make any changes to whom the inside forwards man-mark when you play against teams that play with wingbacks (instead of fullbacks)? Expand
Gianaa9 said: ofc the results are still the same, but as you said now it's easier to put attention on the small difference between tactics. Most of the users just watch occasionally the table and copy straightly the first tactic, even if the difference is 0.2 points in respect to the second one, visualization and downloads are drastically different, now i think it might be just less immediate to associate "first tactic = way better than others", just that.
For example just see this tactic: https://fm-arena.com/thread/13561-cbp87-424-penguin/ It's a month since it was uploaded and downloads/visuals are almost zero, probably less than way worse tactics, but now it'easy to see that win rate it's almost the same with the first ones, and you can also appreciate better RNG effect. Obv nothing changed, just talking about the first impression that this layout can offer . Expand
The problem is that they are not over same number of matches, so FMA must be seeing a reason to stop test run.
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
Test is harder
No but worth trying
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
AND EF 424 IF HP P102 AC
Double pivot 4231 high tempo short passing
For example just see this tactic: https://fm-arena.com/thread/13561-cbp87-424-penguin/
It's a month since it was uploaded and downloads/visuals are almost zero, probably less than way worse tactics, but now it'easy to see that win rate it's almost the same with the first ones, and you can also appreciate better RNG effect. Obv nothing changed, just talking about the first impression that this layout can offer .
The problem is that they are not over same number of matches, so FMA must be seeing a reason to stop test run.