ZaZ said: Yeah, but it's very hard to measure synergy between instructions. Expand
You did before, you will do again.
Zippo said: I can say that we've tested few different formations ( 4-4-2, 5-3-2 ) and also, some other roles and duties to see if there's any difference but the pattern was the same.
Of course, there might a small difference but as said the pattern is almost the same. Expand
Sorry for misunderstanding, i thought you've just tried 4-2-3-1 according to tactical screen of your first post. Details can become more valuable sometimes, thank you for your detailed reply.
Zippo said: Base Tactic: Team Instructions: None Player Instructions: None
Each mentality was tested for 2,880 matches and then the result was translated into a standard season of 36 matches Expand
Thanks for your great job, but i still think different formations can have different effects on different mentalities. It shouldn't be same as attributes, otherwise all maths in FM become rubbish.
You did before, you will do again.
Zippo said: I can say that we've tested few different formations ( 4-4-2, 5-3-2 ) and also, some other roles and duties to see if there's any difference but the pattern was the same.
Of course, there might a small difference but as said the pattern is almost the same.
Sorry for misunderstanding, i thought you've just tried 4-2-3-1 according to tactical screen of your first post. Details can become more valuable sometimes, thank you for your detailed reply.
Team Instructions: None
Player Instructions: None
Each mentality was tested for 2,880 matches and then the result was translated into a standard season of 36 matches
Thanks for your great job, but i still think different formations can have different effects on different mentalities. It shouldn't be same as attributes, otherwise all maths in FM become rubbish.