CSTG KANE said: Here's a summary of my seasonal stats, the numbers at the markers include corners and set pieces, but of course I use more than just the 4231 formation in a season @pixar Expand
Lapidus said: Any top club like PSG, Man City, Liverpool and so on.. they all have extremely fast players in any line and that's what ensures their domination in the game. Expand
What about lower level clubs with players like that?
Unfortunately it seems this is the right way to achieve great things in FM Expand
What team did u pick? I tried to run a "sim" with Bournmouth with players with 16-16 pace or above, but C.A lower than 110. Got around 60 points in vacation. Not too bad
It would be interesting to test this and try and figure out the importance of CA vs Pace/Acc. So, what I mean is, we could try to have a team of players with like 150CA and one with 130CA but with X times more Pace/Acc and see which one does better. We could also do this with a higher/smaller difference in CA, so that we know what is better to recruit, if a player with 120CA and 18 pace/acc or 1 with 150CA and 14 pace/acc for example
Most likely, on defenders you don't really need anything more the pace/JR/acc...
GK is there for the Yolo as well, just liked the aerial Reach
How did you recruit Esposito then?
Are you going after Pace, Acc, Jumping Reach and Driblling? Since season 1?
@pixar
What trainning schedule are you using?
What about lower level clubs with players like that?
Unfortunately it seems this is the right way to achieve great things in FM
What team did u pick? I tried to run a "sim" with Bournmouth with players with 16-16 pace or above, but C.A lower than 110. Got around 60 points in vacation. Not too bad
But i already have an idea, if the difference is just 10 or 20 points of CA, the team with PAC ACC +2 will win
The idea is to pinpoint the exact number where 1 is better than the other