I prefer to use Wing-Back in real games rather than Inverted Wing-Back, so I create this tactics. Because I use Wing-Back, I simply deprecated Winger, which remind me of 442 Diamond formation. I choose Aston Villa and Leeds United for testing, whose media prediction are 8th and 12th.
After more test, "ZaZ - Blue 3.3" and "ZaZ - Blue 3.2 AW" get same score, which reminds me of the effect of DW might not as powerful as I thought and gives me motivation to tweak this position to be more aggressive. Obviously, if change DW to AW, it will be closed to "Albert 4-2-3-1 DM", which I don't have to retest it.
ChrYs 4-2-3-1 Axis SS Changes between "ChrYs 4-4-2 Axis" tactic: -Two Defensive Winger(S) > Shadow Striker(A)
I set WB because I don't use any winger. It's not bad in my test, I think it's due to high WB proficiency of general players in the first season, instead of IWB. So I'm not sure about the score it can get in arena, because IWB is powerful.
"ChrYs 4-4-2 Axis 2RPM" Updated Changes between "ChrYs 4-4-2 Axis 2RPM" tactic: - Central Midfielder(A) > Roaming Playmaker(S)
I choose double RPM trying to share the midfield pressure. I don't set them to parallel because I think it might squeeze IWB's space. Change test team to Chelsea and Aston Villa since the squad of Man City is more powerful.
These tactics are based on "ZaZ - Blue 3.3", and shout-out to @ZaZ ! When I used "ZaZ - Blue 3.3", I noticed that midfield was weak in the "Analysis" page. Because SS won't affect the area behind him, so the midfield might totally depends on RPM/DM. So I choose a CM or a AP, which means that the three-man attacking combination will pull back a little bit.
ChrYs 4-4-2 Axis Changes between "ZaZ - Blue 3.3" tactic: - One Advanced Forward(A) > Central Midfielder(A)
ChrYs 4-4-2SS is actually same formation as Blue 3.0 from FM21 Changes between "ZaZ - Blue 3.3" tactic: - All two Advanced Forward(A) > one Central Midfielder(A) and one Shadow Striker(A)
ChrYs 4-3-3AMC Changes between "ZaZ - Blue 3.3" tactic: - - All two Advanced Forward(A) > one Advanced Playmaker(S) and one Shadow Striker(A)
Because I use Wing-Back, I simply deprecated Winger, which remind me of 442 Diamond formation.
I choose Aston Villa and Leeds United for testing, whose media prediction are 8th and 12th.
Obviously, if change DW to AW, it will be closed to "Albert 4-2-3-1 DM", which I don't have to retest it.
ChrYs 4-2-3-1 Axis SS
Changes between "ChrYs 4-4-2 Axis" tactic:
-Two Defensive Winger(S) > Shadow Striker(A)
ChrYs 4-2-3-1 Axis SS+WB
Changes between "ChrYs 4-2-3-1 Axis SS" tactic:
-Two Inverted Wing-Back(A) > Wing-Back(A)
I set WB because I don't use any winger. It's not bad in my test, I think it's due to high WB proficiency of general players in the first season, instead of IWB. So I'm not sure about the score it can get in arena, because IWB is powerful.
Changes between "ChrYs 4-4-2 Axis 2RPM" tactic:
- Central Midfielder(A) > Roaming Playmaker(S)
I choose double RPM trying to share the midfield pressure.
I don't set them to parallel because I think it might squeeze IWB's space.
Change test team to Chelsea and Aston Villa since the squad of Man City is more powerful.
When I used "ZaZ - Blue 3.3", I noticed that midfield was weak in the "Analysis" page. Because SS won't affect the area behind him, so the midfield might totally depends on RPM/DM. So I choose a CM or a AP, which means that the three-man attacking combination will pull back a little bit.
ChrYs 4-4-2 Axis
Changes between "ZaZ - Blue 3.3" tactic:
- One Advanced Forward(A) > Central Midfielder(A)
ChrYs 4-4-2SS
is actually same formation as Blue 3.0 from FM21
Changes between "ZaZ - Blue 3.3" tactic:
- All two Advanced Forward(A) > one Central Midfielder(A) and one Shadow Striker(A)
ChrYs 4-3-3AMC
Changes between "ZaZ - Blue 3.3" tactic:
- - All two Advanced Forward(A) > one Advanced Playmaker(S) and one Shadow Striker(A)