The tactic is incredible and brings out the best in your team. With Athletic Bilbao in 2027, I was champion of the league 3 times and 2 of the Copa del Rey. In the last one the race was insane, with Real Madrid scoring 96 points and being left without the title.
In the Champions League, unfortunately, I was not successful, falling to giants. In the last one it was painful, after a 6-3 victory at home against PSG, in the return game in Paris, I lost 5-1 with three goals at the end. The team's average PA is 150 +-, only Nico Willians is above 170, while PSG had several players above 180. End of the game is my question against the giants: change to balanced or try to continue attacking?
The attackers struggled to score, but after my newgen reached PA 140 he started to score regularly. The problem is when you go several games without scoring, then you're in crisis and it's complicated. But after he scores one, he scores regularly again. Congratulations to the creator, he gave incredible moments of emotion in the game!
The attacking power is clear, but I would like to know if there are advantages in using the balanced approach when your team is weaker and playing away from home or needs to hold the result against a big team at the end of games, especially away.
Does it indicate continuing the attack or changing to balanced, positive or another suggestion?
I tested it here for 5 games and liked what I saw. The tactic better controls the game and ball possession. Some simple victories, but without suffering, and other easy victories.
The biggest highlight is that the tactic is not 100% intensity. This means that in the long term in a league there is less wear and tear on players without loss of points and income.
sponsorkindest said: @Eddie : You can use this tactic as-is, you might think there is a big difference between 60 and 65, but in-game you wont notice that big of a difference. I am sure the awesome community will keep improving 4231 but in the mean time, you can still use this formation to do a save. Expand
Thanks! And besides, it depends on the profile of your players. For example, I'm at Athletic BIlbao, and given the Basque transfer policy, it's difficult to get two quality strikers, let alone 4 thinking about rotations throughout the season. Thus, the team was not performing very well with the 424 scoring 65 tactic.
But with deaththe team improved a lot and recorded more victories... So you are completely right in your statement!!
And tactics or instructions to hold the result in the last ten minutes? When I arrive with one-nil at the end of the game, I often score the equalizer in an isolated play. Do you have any tips? Since such tactics will never be in the rankings, because the objective is only to secure the result.
4231 Simple Positive Headache v2: This tactic is amazing. The one I've had the most pleasure playing so far. The lower forwards participate very well in the game, as well as the wing-backs. Very consistent defensively and creates many scoring opportunities.
It would be interesting to develop a low-intensity tactic to save energy throughout the season. I made some adaptations and created one, so when I'm winning by more than 2 or 3 goals I put the low intensity tactic and the "game ends", because there are no more goal opportunities for the opposing team besides my team saving energy. I believe that Delicious can do better in this regard to save energy. hehe
I liked this tactic. According to the tests, it seems to be the most defensive and the one that takes the least.
In ten matches I felt that. It's a safe defensive tactic that scores goals. It's nice that the ball is more worked on between the midfielders and it's not just in the direct attack for the two forwards, in short it's a prettier game. I don't really like playing with 2 strikers, besides my squad doesn't have two outstanding strikers, so this tactic is perfect for using a striker and two attacking midfielders
The movement of the two shadow attackers is highlighted, always opening and forming strong lateral attacks.
I liked this tactic. According to the tests, it seems to be the most defensive and the one that takes the least.
In ten matches I felt that. It's a safe defensive tactic that scores goals. It's nice that the ball is more worked on between the midfielders and it's not just in the direct attack for the two forwards, in short it's a prettier game. I don't really like playing with 2 strikers, besides my squad doesn't have two outstanding strikers, so this tactic is perfect for using a striker and two attacking midfielders
The movement of the two shadow attackers is highlighted, always opening and forming strong lateral attacks.
I am having problems with the expulsions. Despite withdrawing or aggressively disarming when they are with yellow cards, sometimes direct expulsions or hair second yellow happen.
Or what does it mean to do tactics with a lesser player? I retire which player or do I change my mentality?
The test doesn't evaluate the effectiveness of tactics for low or medium teams, does it? I try all taties with 2 attackers up front, be it 424 or 41212 and I have a lot of failures against the big teams.
But with his tactics with just one striker and two defensive midfielders I get more consistency and positive results.
Interesting how each tactic can work depending on your squad.
The best ranked tactics on the tactics test table didn't work as well for me, due to it being 4 - 2 4.
I've already incrived the hindle and the symphony works very well with the characteristics of Atheletic Bilbao. In the first part of the calendar the games with the Corsair IF tactic (see several defeats and draws). Already in the second half of the picture, only wins with the symphony.
The game is very beautiful, mainly because it is the tactic 4 3 3 with the best rating. there is ball control and good creation of plays for goals. I am liking it
In the Champions League, unfortunately, I was not successful, falling to giants. In the last one it was painful, after a 6-3 victory at home against PSG, in the return game in Paris, I lost 5-1 with three goals at the end. The team's average PA is 150 +-, only Nico Willians is above 170, while PSG had several players above 180. End of the game is my question against the giants: change to balanced or try to continue attacking?
The attackers struggled to score, but after my newgen reached PA 140 he started to score regularly. The problem is when you go several games without scoring, then you're in crisis and it's complicated. But after he scores one, he scores regularly again. Congratulations to the creator, he gave incredible moments of emotion in the game!
Does it indicate continuing the attack or changing to balanced, positive or another suggestion?
The biggest highlight is that the tactic is not 100% intensity. This means that in the long term in a league there is less wear and tear on players without loss of points and income.
Let's see how it goes with 2400 games
Thanks! And besides, it depends on the profile of your players. For example, I'm at Athletic BIlbao, and given the Basque transfer policy, it's difficult to get two quality strikers, let alone 4 thinking about rotations throughout the season. Thus, the team was not performing very well with the 424 scoring 65 tactic.
But with deaththe team improved a lot and recorded more victories... So you are completely right in your statement!!
It would be interesting to develop a low-intensity tactic to save energy throughout the season. I made some adaptations and created one, so when I'm winning by more than 2 or 3 goals I put the low intensity tactic and the "game ends", because there are no more goal opportunities for the opposing team besides my team saving energy. I believe that Delicious can do better in this regard to save energy. hehe
In ten matches I felt that. It's a safe defensive tactic that scores goals. It's nice that the ball is more worked on between the midfielders and it's not just in the direct attack for the two forwards, in short it's a prettier game. I don't really like playing with 2 strikers, besides my squad doesn't have two outstanding strikers, so this tactic is perfect for using a striker and two attacking midfielders
The movement of the two shadow attackers is highlighted, always opening and forming strong lateral attacks.
In ten matches I felt that. It's a safe defensive tactic that scores goals. It's nice that the ball is more worked on between the midfielders and it's not just in the direct attack for the two forwards, in short it's a prettier game. I don't really like playing with 2 strikers, besides my squad doesn't have two outstanding strikers, so this tactic is perfect for using a striker and two attacking midfielders
The movement of the two shadow attackers is highlighted, always opening and forming strong lateral attacks.
Or what does it mean to do tactics with a lesser player? I retire which player or do I change my mentality?
But with his tactics with just one striker and two defensive midfielders I get more consistency and positive results.
The best ranked tactics on the tactics test table didn't work as well for me, due to it being 4 - 2 4.
I've already incrived the hindle and the symphony works very well with the characteristics of Atheletic Bilbao. In the first part of the calendar the games with the Corsair IF tactic (see several defeats and draws). Already in the second half of the picture, only wins with the symphony.
The game is very beautiful, mainly because it is the tactic 4 3 3 with the best rating. there is ball control and good creation of plays for goals. I am liking it
There, in initial tests it performed best among the tested tactics.
Of the tactics I tested, it was the one that had the most consistency, good defense and attack, according to the prints.
Spanish champion with Athletic Club Bilbao. It was an incredible 43 games without losing in all competitions!
The creator was successful with Forest as they were predicted to finish bottom and make it to the Champions League.
Several success stories, so I believe it's a tactic worth trying in the FM-Arena Tactic Testing League