dodge
classiic said: I have been following these threads for a while and have recently found something that I believe could be worth testing. Forgive me if this is already known, but I have found that you can surpass the limit of 7 Recovery sessions in any given week. With this in mind I have utilised the familiar preferred schedule by most, and altered it to maximise the recovery sessions.

[Quickness]+[Match Practice]+[Attacking]+[Recovery]x7+[Double Intensity]+[Additional Focus Quickness]

1 Match Week
14 Recovery Sessions
Saturday Schedule



2 Match Week
10 Recovery Sessions
Wednesday + Saturday Schedule


These schedules could be viable to further increase the weighting behind the physical attributes, and may offer an alternate approach to maximising the physical output.


I think it's a nice idea to test this... We know that could be classified as an exploit but maybe it's interesting to check if it would have a better impact in the CA growth
Glennson said: Below the routines from Han from the best points scored from each section.
I have uploaded the best attacking corner and best defending one seperatly aswell.


Waiting for it...
Thanks for your response!
Han106 said: On the left is the EBFM Training Schedule and on the right is my training schedule that I made for myself but in testing actually performed well compared to the EBFM schedule. This is 2 tests each of 4 teams so 8-16 players of sample size of each position. I compare the results below.



This is the 2 test results of MAW. All data is formatted in Alphabetical Position order(So AMC, AML/AMR, DCL/DCR, DR, DMC/DM, DL, GK, ST) because that's the best that FM Genie scout can do.



This is the 2 test results of EBFM.

Taking the Top 2 of each position and Clear winners. The Left side is MAW and Right side is EBFM.

AM(MAW) 66.6/65.9 vs 65.8/65.4
W(MAW) 65.6/64.6 vs 64.6/64.6
CB(MAW) 64/63.7 vs 63.7/63.6
FB(TIE) 63.5/63.4 vs 63.7/63.1
DM(TIE) 62.8/62.8 vs 63.2 vs 62.7
GK(EBFM) 58.1/57.9 vs 58.4/58
ST(TIE) 65.1/65 vs 65.1/64.1

This is the training schedule.





For the test file, matches are on Saturdays. I placed the foundational 11 on the left and the Defending Wides afterwards.

I will test other trainings either suggested, or increase sample size. I'm currently testing RDF Gengenpress Sat and General. I managed to at least catch up to EBFM's schedule. Depending on sample size, maybe his or mine win.

https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1m_r3Khn0YCMDi3dogwsYy1OggAuAdzd1?usp=sharing is link where I will put Tested Files.


Hey Han, how you doing?

I have a question about your schedule. I saw it reduces the team cohesion and in a long term, it will be terrible, right? Does it affect or can affect games (like to be worse or something like that).

Good work! Thanks a lot.
Great post! keep up the good work. I'm following it
Nice results! Waiting for 4k tests too
sponsorkindest said: Does anyone know if it’s possible in fm 23

It's the FM Editor players page.
This new training version is a little bit agressive right?

Don't you think thil will rise the player's injury risk?

Is not necessarily to use pre match or recovery and things like that?

Sorry about the question but I'm trying to understand that part about training...