ZaZ said: Sorry, I had two variants with better results, but the combination of them didn't give the expected results. There was some anti-synergy that just made the tactic perform worse. Now I'm testing those two again to see which is better, then call it 0.3. By the way, Fire 0.2 is already pretty good, so it's not so simple to make it even better. Expand
ZaZ said: Three tests to go, with ten runs each, because results were too close and it's hard to say which ones are better, and which ones are actually just statistic noise. Expand
I hope we can have something today bro. We're starving?
Can we have both?
P.S.: I got confused and answered something that had nothing to do.
Yup, too open defensively. Offensively i think its still good, really hoping for something today
Oh and Thanks @Zippo for moving us here
I hope we can have something today bro. We're starving?