- AF moved from left striker to right striker - AM changed into IF and moved from AMCL to AML - Now focussing play down the right, as opposed to down the left
A Smile said: First of all, thank you for your hard work. However, I don't think RNG is any different, this can be seen by the upper and lower limits of the score presented, still generally between 2 and 3, while the more difficult score and the number of tests also offset each other's bonus. There were also nearly identical tactical test results, such as the Problem Solvin V18 and the 424 Classic CBP87 v1.8. RNG is closely related to the number of test venues, and the effectiveness of these three tactical test reforms is only regressive in terms of RNG. I think the accuracy of the test results still needs more test matches to improve, and the tactics with higher scores need to unify the test matches, whether it is 4800 or 9600. Even that doesn't really tell the difference between two nearly identical tactics. Expand
Perhaps they haven't updated the upper and lower limits yet. I doubt they would've restarted if the RNG wasn't actually reduced by the new testing league.
dzek said: Results will be the same regardless of the difficulty and I think every time we (re)test them we will have a different "winner" because all the tactics are close.
Just wondering if FM-Arena introduces the 4222 and 5221 formations to the AI teams to see if there is any change in the results. Expand
I'm not sure if results would be the same regardless of difficulty. Are some tactics not better against harder teams than they are against weaker teams, relative to other tactics?
- Removed overlap and underlap - Attacking mentality - Removed 'run wide with ball', 'dribble more' and 'shoot less often' from FB - Added 'cross from byline' and 'aim crosses at near post' to FB
- 'Cross from byline' and 'take more risks' added to W - 'Take more risks' and 'more direct passing' added to IWB - 'Take more risks' removed from AF and VOL
IF instead of W
RGA instead of VOL
FB instead of IWB
- VOL changed to AM and moved to AMCR
- FB no longer aiming crosses at near post
- AF moved from left striker to right striker
- AM changed into IF and moved from AMCL to AML
- Now focussing play down the right, as opposed to down the left
RNG is closely related to the number of test venues, and the effectiveness of these three tactical test reforms is only regressive in terms of RNG. I think the accuracy of the test results still needs more test matches to improve, and the tactics with higher scores need to unify the test matches, whether it is 4800 or 9600. Even that doesn't really tell the difference between two nearly identical tactics.
Perhaps they haven't updated the upper and lower limits yet. I doubt they would've restarted if the RNG wasn't actually reduced by the new testing league.
dzek said: Results will be the same regardless of the difficulty and I think every time we (re)test them we will have a different "winner" because all the tactics are close.
Just wondering if FM-Arena introduces the 4222 and 5221 formations to the AI teams to see if there is any change in the results.
I'm not sure if results would be the same regardless of difficulty. Are some tactics not better against harder teams than they are against weaker teams, relative to other tactics?
- Added 'take more risks' and 'more direct passing' to IWB
- Added 'Dribble more', 'Shoot less often' and 'Run wide with ball' to FB
- Attacking mentality
- Removed 'run wide with ball', 'dribble more' and 'shoot less often' from FB
- Added 'cross from byline' and 'aim crosses at near post' to FB
- 'Take more risks' removed from AF and VOL
- 'Hold up ball' removed from AM
- 'Take more risks' and 'more direct passing' added to IWB
- 'Take more risks' removed from AF and VOL