|
Uploaded Date
|
Downloads
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
Jan 7, 2026
|
287
|
the current game versionPatch 26.1.3
Precision of Test : +/- 2 PTS | +/- 2 GF | +/- 2 GA
WIN 64%
LOSE 36%
OVERALL STATS
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
72
+31
82
51
1,350
Matches
HOME STATS
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
39
+20
43
23
675
Matches
AWAY STATS
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
33
+11
39
28
675
Matches
Patch 26.1.2
Precision of Test : +/- 2 PTS | +/- 2 GF | +/- 2 GA
WIN 68%
LOSE 32%
OVERALL STATS
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
78
+39
86
47
1,350
Matches
HOME STATS
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
40
+21
42
21
675
Matches
AWAY STATS
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
38
+18
44
26
675
Matches
Patch 26.1.3 tests
Test #1
Date: 13.02.2026
Test #2
Date: 13.02.2026
Test #3
Date: 13.02.2026
Patch 26.1.2 tests
Create an account or log in to leave a comment
Two strikers in a strikerless world.
Run Brighton holiday test twice, won PL both times - sharing screenshots of the second try. Not sure if I got lucky (defensive XG makes me think so a little bit) or is it actually viable.
Surely it will not be any kind of competition for the strikerless tactics, but may be decent for those like myself who are not enjoying the current meta.
Player Instructions Tackle Harder for all but WMs
OCBs - Stay Wider
WMs - Stay Wider
AMs - Make more runs, shoot less often
CHF - Make more runs
Good job with non-meta TIs
Feiwuxiaomei said: Good job with non-meta TIs
Yeah, i mean there are limits to non-meta things You can do to still be plug n play succesfull tactic. I did a lot of testing with shorter passing, lower tempo or higher def line but with every change in those directions results got way worse. So I'm not saying that this is 100% anti meta, because its still strongly inspired by meta, but i did what i could to at least use two strikers or Wide Miedfielders role and still perform quite decent.