Magic box 10

Based on 424 deformation II

- Balanced mentality
- Full backs instead of Wing backs
- Pass into space removed

letsgo9 said: - Full backs instead of Wing backs Expand
I think Full Backs perform better if you have Wingers on the flanks

dzek said: I think Full Backs perform better if you have Wingers on the flanks Expand

I had possession improvement on mind with them
IF is underforming this patch, maybe ill give this idea a try later

letsgo9 said: I had possession improvement on mind with them
IF is underforming this patch, maybe ill give this idea a try later Expand

I meant IF stuff on this tactic specifically

letsgo9 said: I had possession improvement on mind with them
IF is underforming this patch, maybe ill give this idea a try later Expand
IF+WB is good because IF will sit narrower and create space for WB to overlap. FB naturally does more progressive passes but less dribbling/runs. So i think it make senses to use wingers with FB so they can take advantage of those passes.

dzek said: IF+WB is good because IF will sit narrower and create space for WB to overlap. FB naturally does more progressive passes but less dribbling/runs. So i think it make senses to use wingers with FB so they can take advantage of those passes. Expand

Is this hardcoded? Who gonna be the romantic pair with the complete wbs?

letsgo9 said: Is this hardcoded? Who gonna be the romantic pair with the complete wbs? Expand
I ran countless tests last year and it was something I noticed in the stats of those two roles. WBs always had more runs while FBs always had more progressive passes.

CWB doesn't love anyone. That's why it's called "COMPLETE."

dzek said: I ran countless tests last year and it was something I noticed in the stats of those two roles. WBs always had more runs while FBs always had more progressive passes.

CWB doesn't love anyone. That's why it's called "COMPLETE." Expand

LMAO