Author
Uploaded Date
Downloads
Jan 31, 2024
569
latest patchPatch 24.4.0 (DB3.0)
not tested yet
Patch 24.4.0 (DB2.0)
excellent
66.4
60.4
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
63.4
+17
64
47
2,400
Matches
Patch 24.2.0 (DB2.0)
excellent
65.2
60.4
PTS
G.D.
GF
AG
PLD
62.8
+16
63
47
4,000
Matches
Patch 24.4.0 (DB2.0) tests
click to hide
Test #1
Date: 04.03.2024
Test #2
Date: 04.03.2024
Test #3
Date: 04.03.2024
Test #4
Date: 04.03.2024
Test #5
Date: 04.03.2024
Test #6
Date: 04.03.2024
Patch 24.2.0 (DB2.0) tests
click to show

Change:AF+CFS+AF→PFS+PFS+AF

Check the effect of replacing AF and CFS with PFS in this type of player duty, because the right wing needed AF to be involved so it was not changed.

4

Yoooooo, boom!!

0

Oh daaaaamn! Player instructions please!!

Also, what set piece instructions are you using?

0

@A Smile what do you mean with this? "right wing needed AF to be involved so it was not changed"

0

alex said: @A Smile what do you mean with this? "right wing needed AF to be involved so it was not changed"

AF is more likely than other forward types to pull out wide to attack, because the right wing has no wingers, so the AF setting is retained without testing the PFS.

1

Now this is worth trying the positive mentality :)

1

alex said: Now this is worth trying the positive mentality :)

I think the balanced +Underlaps combination works well in most situations with the current engine, but the simplified PI may not be the best choice. I'm going to test it out with 4231.

1
Create an account or log in to leave a comment