- Started with Pressure Cooker - DM, and wings set to Shoot less often - FB acting as IWBs (exact same instructions, except Roam from position which is not available for FBs)
- Pressure Cooker with strikers pulled back to AMCs - AMC + Move into channels - Higher defensive line + drop off more - Overlaps - Removed Focus Play Down LR
Is there a reason why there's so much hype about this tactic? I don't see it being good from my experience with tactic testing. I'm absolutely not hating or anything, I'm just curious
- Started from Pressure Cooker - Replaced one striker with Volante - IWBs -> FBs (Attack) - Moved wingers up to IFs (support) - Overlap instead of underlap
- Trying to bring back DWs
- DWs and DMs set to Shoot less often
I usually do it with wingers since tactic already has WBs.
- SK on support
- PFs with Stay Wide
- AF -> AMC(SS)
- DM, and wings set to Shoot less often
- FB acting as IWBs (exact same instructions, except Roam from position which is not available for FBs)
- AMC + Move into channels
- Higher defensive line + drop off more
- Overlaps
- Removed Focus Play Down LR
Which one would you recommend @chef ?
Don't think it matters.
- Just trying to see how offensive DM changes the score
- Attacking through middle with underlaps
- LDW -> LAM
- RAF -> RSS
- DM -> LDM
- LIWB -> WB(At)
- Left: Overlaps, Right: Underlaps
- Attacking through right side only
- Replaced one striker with Volante
- IWBs -> FBs (Attack)
- Moved wingers up to IFs (support)
- Overlap instead of underlap
Nope