dzek said: @letsgo9 We all follow some rules here. Otherwise everyone would do whatever they wanted and we would generally be like animals in the jungle.
Think of me uploading 30 tactics in 10 minutes without running a test on my own and 5 people also doing that. The rest would wait around 1-2 weeks to test their tactics. It is also not disrespect from us to @CSTG KANE but the opposite. As I have said above in my previous post we could all do this but we don't do it out of respect for the time others waste trying their own tactics. Expand
I saw other members doing the same, I choosed to no expose them... but in the end Its my choice and I undestand them.
and btw Kane has done more here than most of members lately, he made the tactics result average rise up in 1 week with his ideas, gotta show some respect too
juwow said: But there is a correlation between the rules of the website and all members. Its a matter of respect for common rules that we all need to abide for otherwise none of your posts would get tested... One thing is you test a tactic that you tweaked for ages to make it work and another is just spamming variations of something you think it might work until you hit the jackpot. You might as well create your own test league like FM Arena and then not even bother posting or no?
Of course that after you play the game for a while you understand that most tactics that score here 45 plus points are gonna do good in the game but if nobody tested the tactics and presented results from the runs we wouldnt even be here commenting this because EVERYTHING would have been tested. Simulating a season takes time, waitng for the result also takes time so lets not excuse somebody that is admittedly bending the rules. Expand
U r right bro, but in the end is just a strategy to slow the queue down.
I know it seems unfair but Kane is not wrong too, there is no correlation between FM test results and FM Arena benchmarking results. We should be able to test our ideas without wasting this amount of time. Testing stuff with Liverpool/Man City/Man Utd in a season run is just stupid.
Kosarac said: Any Player Instructions if there is can u send, im on console. Expand
AF -> Tackle Harder (TH) CF -> TH IF -> Sit Narrower + TH VOL(A) -> Take More Risks (TMR) + TH DM (S) -> Get Further Forward + TH + TMR WB (A) -> Stay Wider + Shoot Less Often + Dribble More (DM) + TH + TMR BPD -> DM + TH SK -> TH
Think of me uploading 30 tactics in 10 minutes without running a test on my own and 5 people also doing that. The rest would wait around 1-2 weeks to test their tactics. It is also not disrespect from us to @CSTG KANE but the opposite. As I have said above in my previous post we could all do this but we don't do it out of respect for the time others waste trying their own tactics.
I saw other members doing the same, I choosed to no expose them... but in the end Its my choice and I undestand them.
Of course that after you play the game for a while you understand that most tactics that score here 45 plus points are gonna do good in the game but if nobody tested the tactics and presented results from the runs we wouldnt even be here commenting this because EVERYTHING would have been tested. Simulating a season takes time, waitng for the result also takes time so lets not excuse somebody that is admittedly bending the rules.
U r right bro, but in the end is just a strategy to slow the queue down.
- Pushed the left IF to AM(A) position
AF -> Tackle Harder (TH)
CF -> TH
IF -> Sit Narrower + TH
VOL(A) -> Take More Risks (TMR) + TH
DM (S) -> Get Further Forward + TH + TMR
WB (A) -> Stay Wider + Shoot Less Often + Dribble More (DM) + TH + TMR
BPD -> DM + TH
SK -> TH
Somebody teach me lol
+Icebreaker TIs
IF(A) -> IF(S)
VOL (S) -> VOL (A)
+the DM(S) on the CF(S) side -> VOL (S)
+424 CF Cabuloso TI scheme
+ Roll it Out
- Step Up More
+ PI adjustments on VOL(A)