letsgo9
Based on 4231 Anarchy 3

+ higher tempo
dzek said: @letsgo9 and then Balanced mentality ;)

Maybe on positive :woot:
dzek said: @letsgo9 and then Balanced mentality ;)

Nah, this one is on attacking scheme
Jeez, LMAO
Mainz05 said: Hello there and thanks for sharing this tweak @letsgo9 ! Worked great on my 4th season, started with bremen, Stuttgart got relegated. I took over right after and won promotion.The return to Bundesliga was tough cause i was rebuilding the team and finished 4th place with another tactic. This season tried this version, i really enjoy 3ATB tactics and it was a breeze, really solid both defensively and attacking. Here's some SS:
P.S. - No holiday nor IR, played all matches.


gj on squad building
Based on 4231 Anarchy 2

+attacking mentality
Based on 4231 Anarchy

- Be more expressive removed
Trying some new stuff in the 4231 shape
dzek said: And the next test will be with no instructions on “in possession” and “in transition” 😂

Too much useless stuff we should keep it simple :angel:
Based on 4231 Hegemony underlap

I'm seeing ppl excluding focus play and underlaps/overlaps in some tactics and being sucessfull... I think we should do the opposite, exclude everything and keep focus play and underlaps lol
Based on another Hegemony tweak

+ attacking mentality
Based on 4231 Hegemony underlap

- counter
- no instructions for keeper distribution
- step up more
+ balanced mentality
Based on FM24 Italian KO and 4231 Hegemony - Dzek Tweak V6

Mixed them and adjusted some PIs

Only 15 goals taken during the season. Finally I've managed to accomplish the lengedary Chelsea 04/05 record. My beloved Mourinho would be proud of me.
Based on This

AF -> CF(A)
Overlaps -> Underlaps
Based on 424 IFB Supremacy - FoF

CFs -> AFs
Underlaps -> Overlaps
BPDs -> stoppers
IFBs -> take more risks
dzek said: Overlap Left

but the overlap is on the IF flank in the original tactic
dzek said: Maybe you want to try it one more time but keep TIs as the original?

If r suggesting just the mirror shape but keeping the PIs then is a new tactic
dzek said: Maybe you want to try it one more time but keep TIs as the original?

There is any TIs that are dif? I tried to replicate everything ..  if something is diff It was accidentally a mistake
Wish said: Interesting, thanks for the idea of doing the test.

I think this should be tested further b4 drawn any conclusions, for me it seems that they are the same
Avenger22 said: Isn't in this case the shape same as FB(D) cause IFB don't invert when 2 CB are in place

I choosed IFB for being a meta role