Germaniac said: The biggest problem in my opinion, is sorting the table by GD will be inaccurate. For example: Expand First of all, we always can sort tactics in the tables on "raw" values(not rounded), probably, that happens right now but I'm not 100% sure about that. Anyway, it's really isn't a big deal taking into consideration the RNG.
Germaniac said: For example, 64.4-47.6 will be rounded (to nearest integer) to 64-48=16, but if you calculate 64.4-47.6=16.8 first it'll be rounded to 17. Expand
We had the tables the way you say before but it was quite confusing. For example, people were looking at a table and seeing that GF = 64 and GA = 48 so сertainly the GD should be equal to "16" in this case because 64-48=16 but somehow it was "17" in the table so they were reporting to us about a "wrong" calculation and so on. So after some consideration we decided that the current approach is better.
Germaniac said: Not sure if this should go here, but it seems that GD on the table is calculated from the GF-GA after each of them are rounded? If it's true then it can be less accurate than rounding the GD after you calculate GF-GA first. For example, 64.9-48.1 will be rounded (to nearest integer) to 64-48=16, but if you calculate 64.9-48.1=16.8 first it'll be rounded to 17. Expand
Hi,
We are aware of such rounding might happen but still we think that adding decimal numbers to G.F., G.A. and G.D. would be "overkill" because when in the testing the minimal RNG is +/- 1-2 points when it comes to Pts and +/- 2-3 G.D. when it comes to G.D. then having decimal numbers for G.D. doesn't make sense. Yes, we added decimal numbers for Pts but still we aren't 100% sure they are needed even for Pts.
Guys, I just want to let you know that the switching to the new DB 3.0 didn't go smoothly and few small bugs managed to lurk in but don't worry, we already have found and fixed them.
It's just don't be surprised to see some tactics that already have been tested under the new DB 3.0 get retested once more, we retest them because we want to be sure the result aren't affected by the small bugs that I mentioned.
Gianaa9 said: Hi, don't need to rush obviously, just thought it because having uploaded both at same time i believed that they would have been tested together, but if it isn't the case it isn't absolutely a problem, i'm not hurry at all ahah Expand
Unfortunately, we not always have time to carefully inspect every tactic posted but I agree with you, we should apply some "restrictions" to those people who systematically ignore the requirements.
@Cherknam, you're "in the crosshair", pal. I suggest you to revisit your previously posted tactics and make sure they meet the requirements.
Look at this - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/
Please, fix all your previously posted tactics to meet the requirements.
Thanks.
Please, try to click the button once more. It should work properly this time.
Thanks.
Ok, I see. We'll into it. Once I have more info I'll let you know.
Thanks.
Hi,
Have you tried to click the button below after fixing your post?
Please, review all your previously posted tactics and change the description from "Some PI changes." to the exact PI changes you made.
Thanks.
First of all, we always can sort tactics in the tables on "raw" values(not rounded), probably, that happens right now but I'm not 100% sure about that. Anyway, it's really isn't a big deal taking into consideration the RNG.
Germaniac said: just round GD after calculating GF-GA.
Germaniac said: For example, 64.4-47.6 will be rounded (to nearest integer) to 64-48=16, but if you calculate 64.4-47.6=16.8 first it'll be rounded to 17.
We had the tables the way you say before but it was quite confusing. For example, people were looking at a table and seeing that GF = 64 and GA = 48 so сertainly the GD should be equal to "16" in this case because 64-48=16 but somehow it was "17" in the table so they were reporting to us about a "wrong" calculation and so on. So after some consideration we decided that the current approach is better.
Hi,
We are aware of such rounding might happen but still we think that adding decimal numbers to G.F., G.A. and G.D. would be "overkill" because when in the testing the minimal RNG is +/- 1-2 points when it comes to Pts and +/- 2-3 G.D. when it comes to G.D. then having decimal numbers for G.D. doesn't make sense. Yes, we added decimal numbers for Pts but still we aren't 100% sure they are needed even for Pts.
I uploaded the wrong tactic. Can I re-upload the right one and get a new test?
Sorry guys.
Hi, @dzek. Our system doesn't have such functionality, sorry, we can't do that.
Hi, @A Smile.
Can you try to add it for retesting again?
If you still have an issue then let us know.
Thanks.
Only the person who posted a tactic can make a request to retest it.
So it's up to @Jae whether he want to see this tactic retested or not.
It's just don't be surprised to see some tactics that already have been tested under the new DB 3.0 get retested once more, we retest them because we want to be sure the result aren't affected by the small bugs that I mentioned.
I can only edit post w/o the tactic and its name
Hi,
I've "unlocked" it, you can edit the name.
Hi,
I've moved it into FM24 section for you, no need to reupload it.
It seems that you accidently uploaded the same tactic again.
Please, compare this tactic and your other tactic - https://fm-arena.com/thread/10498-ton-v9-424-th-p100/
Let's me know if I miss something here.
Thanks.
Hi,
Only English language is allowed here. Please, edit your post or it'll be removed.
Thanks.
The queue is based on "Round-Robin" algorithm you can read more about it here - https://fm-arena.com/thread/3198-test-order/
Hi,
What does make you think that it was skipped?
Only English language is allowed.
Please, translate your post or it'll be removed.
Thanks.
Thanks and apologies again
Hi,
I really tried to figure out what happened here and what you say but it's too complicated so I failed.
I can say only one thing every thread must have correct screenshots and if there's something wrong just fix it and it's the end of the story.
GL.
I wonder why don't you say exactly what PIs you added/removed.
@Zippo @Droid according to this - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/ people must write up the changes they make but I've been noticing some people ignore that requirement. I think there must be some kind of "punishments" for that.
Hi,
Unfortunately, we not always have time to carefully inspect every tactic posted but I agree with you, we should apply some "restrictions" to those people who systematically ignore the requirements.
@Cherknam, you're "in the crosshair", pal.