Germaniac said: The biggest problem in my opinion, is sorting the table by GD will be inaccurate. For example: Expand First of all, we always can sort tactics in the tables on "raw" values(not rounded), probably, that happens right now but I'm not 100% sure about that. Anyway, it's really isn't a big deal taking into consideration the RNG.
Germaniac said: For example, 64.4-47.6 will be rounded (to nearest integer) to 64-48=16, but if you calculate 64.4-47.6=16.8 first it'll be rounded to 17. Expand
We had the tables the way you say before but it was quite confusing. For example, people were looking at a table and seeing that GF = 64 and GA = 48 so сertainly the GD should be equal to "16" in this case because 64-48=16 but somehow it was "17" in the table so they were reporting to us about a "wrong" calculation and so on. So after some consideration we decided that the current approach is better.
Germaniac said: Not sure if this should go here, but it seems that GD on the table is calculated from the GF-GA after each of them are rounded? If it's true then it can be less accurate than rounding the GD after you calculate GF-GA first. For example, 64.9-48.1 will be rounded (to nearest integer) to 64-48=16, but if you calculate 64.9-48.1=16.8 first it'll be rounded to 17. Expand
Hi,
We are aware of such rounding might happen but still we think that adding decimal numbers to G.F., G.A. and G.D. would be "overkill" because when in the testing the minimal RNG is +/- 1-2 points when it comes to Pts and +/- 2-3 G.D. when it comes to G.D. then having decimal numbers for G.D. doesn't make sense. Yes, we added decimal numbers for Pts but still we aren't 100% sure they are needed even for Pts.
Guys, I just want to let you know that the switching to the new DB 3.0 didn't go smoothly and few small bugs managed to lurk in but don't worry, we already have found and fixed them.
It's just don't be surprised to see some tactics that already have been tested under the new DB 3.0 get retested once more, we retest them because we want to be sure the result aren't affected by the small bugs that I mentioned.
Please, don't spam about PIs.
I'm sure that @Gerrard noticed your request and he will post them when he got time for it.
Click on the button
Changing the tactic after a test is too much fuss and it's not worth the effort.
But I'll change the tactic name and the thread name, it's quite easy to do.
Please, edit the opening post and make it meet the requirements https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/
Thanks.
Mirror versions aren't allowed for testing.
https://fm-arena.com/find-comment/37981/
Please, update the opening post and all the necessary information so the thread would meet the requirements - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/
Thanks.
Look at this - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/
Please, fix all your previously posted tactics to meet the requirements.
Thanks.
Please, try to click the button once more. It should work properly this time.
Thanks.
Ok, I see. We'll into it. Once I have more info I'll let you know.
Thanks.
Hi,
Have you tried to click the button below after fixing your post?
Please, review all your previously posted tactics and change the description from "Some PI changes." to the exact PI changes you made.
Thanks.
First of all, we always can sort tactics in the tables on "raw" values(not rounded), probably, that happens right now but I'm not 100% sure about that. Anyway, it's really isn't a big deal taking into consideration the RNG.
Germaniac said: just round GD after calculating GF-GA.
Germaniac said: For example, 64.4-47.6 will be rounded (to nearest integer) to 64-48=16, but if you calculate 64.4-47.6=16.8 first it'll be rounded to 17.
We had the tables the way you say before but it was quite confusing. For example, people were looking at a table and seeing that GF = 64 and GA = 48 so сertainly the GD should be equal to "16" in this case because 64-48=16 but somehow it was "17" in the table so they were reporting to us about a "wrong" calculation and so on. So after some consideration we decided that the current approach is better.
Hi,
We are aware of such rounding might happen but still we think that adding decimal numbers to G.F., G.A. and G.D. would be "overkill" because when in the testing the minimal RNG is +/- 1-2 points when it comes to Pts and +/- 2-3 G.D. when it comes to G.D. then having decimal numbers for G.D. doesn't make sense. Yes, we added decimal numbers for Pts but still we aren't 100% sure they are needed even for Pts.
I uploaded the wrong tactic. Can I re-upload the right one and get a new test?
Sorry guys.
Hi, @dzek. Our system doesn't have such functionality, sorry, we can't do that.
Hi, @A Smile.
Can you try to add it for retesting again?
If you still have an issue then let us know.
Thanks.
Only the person who posted a tactic can make a request to retest it.
So it's up to @Jae whether he want to see this tactic retested or not.
It's just don't be surprised to see some tactics that already have been tested under the new DB 3.0 get retested once more, we retest them because we want to be sure the result aren't affected by the small bugs that I mentioned.
I can only edit post w/o the tactic and its name
Hi,
I've "unlocked" it, you can edit the name.
Hi,
I've moved it into FM24 section for you, no need to reupload it.