@Mayrzx, hi.

The screenshots must be in English. Also, the tactic name doesn't meet the requirements.

More info - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/

Thanks.

@FMK Mark, hi.

The screenshots must be in English - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/

Thanks.

Lionheart23 said: Is Lionheart 4231 a valid name? Expand

Yes, "Lionheart 4231" would be a valid name.

Lionheart23 said: Is Lionheart 4231 V2 a valid name? Expand

Yes, "Lionheart 4231 V2" would be a valid name

Chris said: can you 4k test this tactic? Every top tactic has it but this one doesn't Expand

The current testing algorithm is:

- all tactics by default get tested for 1,200 matches.

- the top tactic gets an additional testing up to 4,000 matches.

- if a tactic gets into Hof after 1,200 matches then it gets an additional testing up 2,400 matches.

- if a tactic gets a score that is 2 points less than the top tactic after 1,200 matches then it gets an additional testing up to 2,400 matches

- if a tactics after 2,400 matches get a score that is 1 point less than the top tactic then it gets an additional testing up 4,000 matches


This tactic wasn't tested for 4,000 matches because after 2,400 matches it scored 2 points less than the top tactic if it was 1 point less then it would get 4,000 matches

Lionheart23 said: can test? Expand

As I already told you that the names of your tactic doesn't meet the requirements.

More info on naming tactics - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/

Thanks.

mertalaman said: i edited can u check now pls . thank u Expand

As you can see the player stats are hidden behind the pop-up window, they must be visible.

@Jae, hi.

The names of your recent tactics aren't ok. Please, change it.

More info on naming tactics - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/

Thanks.

@Lionheart23, hi.

The names of your recent untested tactics aren't ok.

Please, change it.

https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/

CSTG KANE said: xie xie zhi chi Expand

Hi,

Please, edit your post because only English language is allowed here.

Thanks.

mertalaman said: can u pls try now Expand

All those screenshots should be in the opening post. Edit the opening post and make it meet the requirements.

@Sego, the tactic's name isn't ok

https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/

@opq, the name isn't ok

CBP87 said: Yes but it could also lose points. I think if my memory serves me correctly 4000 is the sweet spot for RNG but you are right luck plays a part Expand

Hi,

The following algorithm is used at this moment:

- if a tactic gets straight to the top after 1200 matches then at fist it gets tested up to 2400 matches and if it still keeps the 1st place after 2400 matches only then it gets tested up to 4000 matches

letsgo9 said: gotta to creare a test table only for him coz is kind hard to follow his results
@dzek any tips? Expand


Speed said: Yeah I think having a table with benchmarks for how the average default formations perform would be great. What you can do now is filter by author: Football Manager. Expand


dzek said: I'm not sure if I understood what you're saying, but if you mean creating a separate table for Preset Tactics it was something I suggested 2 months ago to @Zippo. Expand

There're filters in the tables. You can filter the result "by author name" and get what you want.

Please notice, to filter the preset tactics he uploaded you need to put "Football Manager" as the author and not @Telespiza because as you might notice @Telespiza puts "Football Manager" as the author of the uploaded preset tactics.

But, honestly, I find that testing the preset tactics is waste of time, I really don't understand who needs it and what is the purpose.

dzek said: You are clear. It was just a question I had.
If wants to repost the tactic then he can do so. Expand

I just want to add that there's no need in creating a new thread for this tactic if you want to see it retested for 24.2.0 patch, you can just post your result(table, fixtures, player sstats) with this tactic for 24.2.0 patch in this thread.

dzek said: Maybe with Volante's change to the DM role and the new game update there would have been a difference but you guys know better so we move on. Thanks for the reply! Expand

I just want to be clear here, I didn't make any prediction or assumption about this tactic performance for 24.2.0 patch, I just explained you why this tactic wasn't picked for the 24.2.0 patch retesting because other 4-2-4 tactic with a better score by this author was picked instead of this tactic.

Btw, if think this tactic(or any other) is worth retesting for 24.2.0 patch then post some result with it for 24.2.0 patch in this thread and we'll look into it.

dzek said: @Zippo I think this should be tested because it got a better score than the 424 black ice on the previous update. Expand

For the 24.2.0 patch retesting this tactic was "overwritten" by other tactic - https://fm-arena.com/thread/7427-gloryfm24-424-v3-0/, which also had a better score than this tactic and 424 black ice tactic for 24.1.0 patch but as you can see in 24.2.0 patch it has a lower score.

dzek said: I think in every new update they retest all HoF tactics. Expand

That's correct and even more tactics will be retested.