Droid
@dzek, the post doesn't meet the requirements for getting tested.

More info - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/
franklyfm84 said: These are the team stats

Btw, If you add screenshots of the team stats for your previously posted tactic - https://fm-arena.com/thread/4500-f84-broken-point-451/ then it also will be tested.
@franklyfm84, if you're looking for it to get tested then screenshots of the team stats are missing.

https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/
Jogofeen said: Slight tweak to my last 424 tactic.
Getting lot better results in my Hibs save


https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/
JM5 said: .
The tactic description is not Ok.
JPR said: Is this going to be tested?

As @Markizio said, the tactic description is pathetic. Be a bit more creative about it.
caeden said: The build-up was smoother and both wingbacks were more aggressive by opening wide defenders. One defensive midfielder was given a more defensive role than his partner.

https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/
pistolevich said: Updated the tactic

If you want it gets tested then you need to create a new thread for it.
Yarema said: Honestly Zippo's tests are probably better use of resources anyway.
Instructions Testing and Tactic Testing are different beasts, they are supposed to complement each other.

No need to worry there's enough room for both approaches.
@Mark, you forgot to put a screenshot of the tactic.
ganada said: Is there problem with my post?

It looks fine now.