santiago3445 said: ı m edit thank you Expand Obviously, your tactic is based on the shape that has been tested very well on here(please, add a link to it) so you need to explain what changes did you make and what you are trying to test.
penpen said: I already deleted savefile I just simulated it with that state and is it okay making new savefile and append screenshot of it? or uploading new is better Expand
The only what you need to do is clicking on the "Edit" button and change the name.
TommyToxic said: You are not following my logic. I'm writing about reasons for writing a description, you are writing about reasons for testing. The two are different obviously, as small changes can have an impact on the results. I respect the rules so I've added what I wrote earlier to the description as you requested. Having tactics tested is a great service so I don't mean to be disrespectful. Expand
then you learn that the decision about whether to test a tactic or not is based on the tactic representation which must consist of a description and screenshots to backup your tactic.
When you put "." or "description" or "oohhh there's nothing to say" as the description then it looks quite disrespectful and in this case don't be surprised to see your tactics being ignored.
Of course, it's up to you to decide what to do... I'm just saying...
TommyToxic said: Because tbf most of the tactics posted here are just the same tactic with a few tweaks so it just seems superfluous to write anything unless you create something very different from whats already here. Expand
If follow your logic then there's also no point in testing a tactic until it offers something very different from whats already here.
If you don't believe your tactic brings anything new and you don't believe it's capable of moving the progress forward then what's the point in offering it for the testing?
And that's exactly what you should put in the description.
The changes from your previous version are really irrelevant in this case and they can be removed.
We need to know what people try to test and how it's different from what that has been tested already.
Obviously, your tactic is based on the shape that has been tested very well on here(please, add a link to it) so you need to explain what changes did you make and what you are trying to test.
Only English language is allowed here. Please, edit your posts or they'll be deleted.
I just simulated it with that state and is it okay making new savefile and append screenshot of it?
or uploading new is better
The only what you need to do is clicking on the "Edit" button and change the name.
Fixed.
It clearly says that GF and GA stats should be visible on the league table.
Just to be clear here, if you read this - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2733-how-to-get-your-tactic-tested/
then you learn that the decision about whether to test a tactic or not is based on the tactic representation which must consist of a description and screenshots to backup your tactic.
When you put "." or "description" or "oohhh there's nothing to say" as the description then it looks quite disrespectful and in this case don't be surprised to see your tactics being ignored.
Of course, it's up to you to decide what to do... I'm just saying...
If follow your logic then there's also no point in testing a tactic until it offers something very different from whats already here.
If you don't believe your tactic brings anything new and you don't believe it's capable of moving the progress forward then what's the point in offering it for the testing?
Then please put that in the description.
Or if there's nothing special in your tactic then what is the point in testing it?
I don't find any?