WindellSG said: Hello Guys, just bought FM24. Is this the best tactic currently and is it a plug and play for most teams? Are set pieces programmed? Expand
on the winger role, is it better to find WBs to slot in that position? I have difficulties finding good players who are natural or competent in that position
JustinCredible said: What's the rationale for testing this tactic over a larger number of matches than the others? Surely the sensible thing to do is to test all tactics in the same conditions over the same number of matches (the more the better) Expand
An attempt on Fairly Narrow Attacking Width. This turned out to be the most successful one-season performance I managed to get on holiday, achieving an invincible season in the prem (tho with City).
Mentality: Positive -> Attacking DM -> remove take more risks AMC -> remove hold up ball, add dribble more + roam from position AM(wide) -> add cross less often + roam from position FB -> remove take more risks and add sit narrower SK -> Defend to Support, remove tackle harder
A Smile said: It doesn't actually make much difference which team you test with, because different teams have different criteria for results, and the advantage of choosing Manchester City is that the results will be a bit more consistent. Expand
yes, and 104 is actually really decent even for City, which suggests that the ME likes your tac
it sure is
One word: threshold.
ah I see, thanks. I think that's the common trait for all lone-striker systems
Mentality: Positive -> Attacking
DM -> remove take more risks
AMC -> remove hold up ball, add dribble more + roam from position
AM(wide) -> add cross less often + roam from position
FB -> remove take more risks and add sit narrower
SK -> Defend to Support, remove tackle harder
yes, and 104 is actually really decent even for City, which suggests that the ME likes your tac
I reckon most people with decent manner would give constructive criticism rather than being an ass hole with a condescending tone.