Yarema said: All of them are pretty good, none are perfect. Plus there is more to performance than just these ratings. Hidden attributes, suitability to your tactic, form and so on all play a massive role. Expand
I dont see much diference between them in hidden atributes, the only one with more than +2 points in the diference is adaptability, which is far superior in Hojlund with 17 against 12 from konate
I just dont know what ratings use right now... I bought konaté wich is by far better in ratings compared to hojlund but the last one is always performing better, scoring more, assisting more... and its not the first time it is happening to me with some players.. its weird to me
@ZaZ im using your "rest" recomendation and your training routine, its supposed to be used since pre-season right? im getting some long duration injuries (can be rng), fatigue metrics seems fine. Any advice?
AlexH said: I appreciate the work in Python. For those asking "why don't" - well, some of us do a bit more. I have my own ratings (customized to my passing-heavy style of play), my own metrics (ratings against "average" or "best in the world" ) and my own views (what is my best squad for national competitions?).
Diversity of thought and effort is pretty good. But I'm sure if you just use Squirrel Plays or whatever, you'll be fine too Expand
letsgo9 said: Definitelly something to think about. But when actually playing games, mainly if u r a underdog team, balanced mentality seems way superior than attacking. Expand
How you determine if you are an underdog? because of the reports from board and fans or press? or looking at their team and comparing?
So basically, after all the tests, everything that matter are players and their stats lol, u can play with default tactic and it will be "practically" the same
Sorry just followed the topic you both were talking about and wanted to help
edit: its still december in my save btw
Konate | jumping 6 - 16 | Hojlund
Konate | balance 16 - 16 | Hojlund
Konate | agility 18 - 13 | Hojlund
Konate | dribbling 15 - 13 | Hojlund
Konate | pace 17 - 17 | Hojlund
Konate | accel 19 - 14 | Hojlund
Yarema said: All of them are pretty good, none are perfect. Plus there is more to performance than just these ratings. Hidden attributes, suitability to your tactic, form and so on all play a massive role.
I dont see much diference between them in hidden atributes, the only one with more than +2 points in the diference is adaptability, which is far superior in Hojlund with 17 against 12 from konate
Diversity of thought and effort is pretty good. But I'm sure if you just use Squirrel Plays or whatever, you'll be fine too
still using mdw22 ratings in GS?
How you determine if you are an underdog? because of the reports from board and fans or press? or looking at their team and comparing?
Try to use vpn if u cannot get access.
tyty
ive been looking for tangfu since fm23 release and didnt find it! can u please share?
thank you so much!
used tangfu in fm21 and loved it
the tests are in 3000 games, and there are hardly any changes, in some cases the difference is 3-4 goals in 3000 games... it is negligible