Home Page
Forum & Tactics
Tables
Tactic Testing Log
Search
Log In
Sign Up
Germaniac
Profile
Find Threads
Find Posts
1
PREV
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
NEXT
Page 9 of 11
Go
3430 test OCB
Posted Dec 23, 2025
dzek said:
@Germaniac
did you also test it with IWs on both flanks?
Expand
Yes, it's
here
. I'll request a retest.
3430 test TAM WOW
Posted Dec 20, 2025
Testing the TAM and WOW roles. No PIs.
3430 test TW
Posted Dec 20, 2025
Testing the TW role. No PIs.
3430 test WOW
Posted Dec 19, 2025
Testing the WOW role. No PIs.
3430 test OAM
Posted Dec 19, 2025
Testing the OAM role. No PIs.
3430 test PDM
Posted Dec 18, 2025
Testing the PDM role. No PIs.
3430 test OAM IOW
Posted Dec 18, 2025
Testing the OAM and IOW roles. No PIs.
3430 test OAM WOW
Posted Dec 17, 2025
Testing the OAM and WOW roles. No PIs.
3430 test TAM TW
Posted Dec 17, 2025
Testing the TAM and TW roles. No PIs.
3430 test AWB
Posted Dec 16, 2025
Testing the AWB role. No PIs.
3430 test IW
Posted Dec 16, 2025
Testing the IW role. No PIs.
3430 test OCB CHM
Posted Dec 15, 2025
Testing the CHM role on AMC position. No PIs.
3430 test OCB AM
Posted Dec 15, 2025
Testing the AM role on AMC position. No PIs.
3430 test OCB
Posted Dec 14, 2025
Testing the OCB role. No PIs.
3430 test AP
Posted Dec 14, 2025
Testing the AP role. No PIs.
3430 test AM
Posted Dec 13, 2025
treath said:
so...aboslute no difference?
Expand
Test says AM is better defensively while CHM is better offensively, but the difference is small so it could also just be RNG.
3430 test ACB
Posted Dec 13, 2025
Testing the ACB role. No PIs.
3430 test FR
Posted Dec 13, 2025
Testing the FR role. No PIs.
3430 test CHM
Posted Dec 12, 2025
Testing AM vs CHM on the meta tactic shape. No PIs.
3430 test AM
Posted Dec 12, 2025
Testing AM vs CHM on the meta tactic shape. No PIs.
1
PREV
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
NEXT
Page 9 of 11
Go
Yes, it's here. I'll request a retest.
Test says AM is better defensively while CHM is better offensively, but the difference is small so it could also just be RNG.