Okay, so what if, in the case of 'Very Fluid' team fluidity, that it would probably need more than a season for it to work? Team cohesion & tactical familiarity would maybe play a larger part in getting tactics like this to work.
I mean, yeah, putting more players on 'support' would increase your team fluidity, and maybe there are untouched territory of "meta" tactics in the zone of high fluidity, and it could be the case that it's untouched because more players are on support (therefore less attacking mentality), so it's not reaaally tried - and when you try it, you probably won't get immediate results in the first season. But is it really the case that it won't be attacking in any way?
I mean, yeah, putting more players on 'support' would increase your team fluidity, and maybe there are untouched territory of "meta" tactics in the zone of high fluidity, and it could be the case that it's untouched because more players are on support (therefore less attacking mentality), so it's not reaaally tried - and when you try it, you probably won't get immediate results in the first season. But is it really the case that it won't be attacking in any way?
Idk, a possibility
Let's see if this at least gets an 'ok'
Removed most of the PI's on the WB & FB, added 'Dribble More' to the FB.
Added goalkeeper distribution specificity
Can't really gauge the difference, this fixture list has such a huge morale drop section
BBM switched to CM(s)
One BPD on Cover
But with Trequartistas on the flanks.
Did well with Luton, but admittedly did not do too well in the Serie A
Holiday tested, just 17 points away from winning the league
This but a half-back instead of an RPM
Holiday Tested
Seemed like they were missing out on some clear cut progressive passes