I did some parallel testing with Ajax, since they have a lot of good youngsters with high PA. In experiment A, I used V7 in first team, U21 and U19. In experiment B, I used assistant manager for training for all teams. At the end of the season, I took note of all CA growth + what attributes rose the most.
In B, when AI controls training, the CA growth is actually bigger. Players grow more rounded and they get more attributes increased. In A, with V7, they get less CA points growth, but ACC/PAC are slightly more increased than in B.
I'm a bit disappointed, to be honest, since I got more growth by simply not touching training. True, ACC/PAC with V7 over a few years are significantly higher, but overall players profit more with AI training.
Has anyone tried this with semi-professional teams? They have limited training so the only logical regime to choose for them is something like R5, to rest and focus on quickness.
I've tried it with Vanarama North team and at the end of the season there was almost no CA or Pace/Acceleration progress, even with young players with CA/PA of 30/110, for example.
In experiment A, I used V7 in first team, U21 and U19.
In experiment B, I used assistant manager for training for all teams.
At the end of the season, I took note of all CA growth + what attributes rose the most.
In B, when AI controls training, the CA growth is actually bigger. Players grow more rounded and they get more attributes increased.
In A, with V7, they get less CA points growth, but ACC/PAC are slightly more increased than in B.
I'm a bit disappointed, to be honest, since I got more growth by simply not touching training. True, ACC/PAC with V7 over a few years are significantly higher, but overall players profit more with AI training.
They have limited training so the only logical regime to choose for them is something like R5, to rest and focus on quickness.
I've tried it with Vanarama North team and at the end of the season there was almost no CA or Pace/Acceleration progress, even with young players with CA/PA of 30/110, for example.