In a nutshell, I tried to improve the tactic performance against superior teams (I've notice that's the main stuff that matters on the test). I'm expecting a score btween 52-55 points score. Hope it works, lmao
I ran a couple of holiday season with this tactic (one of them with a underdog team as well - Brentford). I've made some tweaks on set pieces, individual instructions (took mark tighter from dms for instance). I decided to add stop crosses on defensive phase, due the matches I played away against super teams. It made the tactic concede less goals. I removed work in the box as well (I thought that was making players more error prone and giving transitions). Here the following results:
So I couldn't write main memo when I upload the tactic
So I reply , base on wh tactic
I'm a just common fm user who love good tactic
So I just wanna improve wh tactic's lack attack ability
Cuz wh tactics defense line is really good it is perfect I think in2 3.1 version
So I did mix wh and zaz tactic, but it is not good
Only wh tactics depen line have to standard make a some tactic
So I try so many change and finally just ss change af
That is a really good attack and defense
This is a whole story Expand
Owright man, lets move on. Im sry if I offended u somehow. I didnt mean to be negative about ur work. U did well improving west hammer. Gj, keep ur good work.
Regarding the situation I think that was some kind of misunderstanding, I guess you didn't want to offend anyone when making your 'observation' but I suggest you to be a bit more polite when next time you that because it might sound like you accuse him in something. Expand
Ty, that's what happend. After that kind of reactions I will, for sure. I wasnt expecting so much drama.
ntr master said: Thanks to the creators of West Ham tactics. The attack was disappointing, but it's good that it has improved. I hope that better fraud tactics come out sooner.
i just only wanna really good tactic to enjoy fm op for opserving
and i hope my favorite player gets all the awards with good stats. Expand
Wasnt an attack dude, I am new to the forum. I didnt notice that u quoted westhammer. Another guys in the forum said the same thing. Idk why u guys are cmming after me because this facts. What I said still true tbh.
OpticFawn said: You’ve said this already, what’s the point, you’re clearly trying to make something out of this, we’re here to get the best tactics statically possible, and the creator of this version clearly mentions that he got most of his inspiration from that tactic.
So if you don’t have anything better to do, simply enjoy the game and appreciate the good tactics you have access to in this game! Expand
I want a moderador to check this out, I simply made an observation and this guy is attacking me out of nowwhere? @Droid
It's from one of the SI match engine guys trying to emulate Mourinho's Porto. I tried to tweak his tatic based on what u guys are producing here and I managed to get some of the results attached. I would like to try this kind of assymetry on ur algoritmic pattern. There are two tactics, one is a underdog version. Ty
I tried few games against L'pool away, Ball playing CBs made us conceive too many goals. When I changed them to regular CBs we managed to compete against them. The overall season result was better to me with the CB's as well, here some example.
Hope it works, lmao
I ran a couple of holiday season with this tactic (one of them with a underdog team as well - Brentford). I've made some tweaks on set pieces, individual instructions (took mark tighter from dms for instance). I decided to add stop crosses on defensive phase, due the matches I played away against super teams. It made the tactic concede less goals. I removed work in the box as well (I thought that was making players more error prone and giving transitions). Here the following results:
I'm not a attacker : (
It's my first time to use this site
So I couldn't write main memo when I upload the tactic
So I reply , base on wh tactic
I'm a just common fm user who love good tactic
So I just wanna improve wh tactic's lack attack ability
Cuz wh tactics defense line is really good it is perfect I think in2 3.1 version
So I did mix wh and zaz tactic, but it is not good
Only wh tactics depen line have to standard make a some tactic
So I try so many change and finally just ss change af
That is a really good attack and defense
This is a whole story
Owright man, lets move on. Im sry if I offended u somehow. I didnt mean to be negative about ur work. U did well improving west hammer. Gj, keep ur good work.
Regarding the situation I think that was some kind of misunderstanding, I guess you didn't want to offend anyone when making your 'observation' but I suggest you to be a bit more polite when next time you that because it might sound like you accuse him in something.
Ty, that's what happend. After that kind of reactions I will, for sure. I wasnt expecting so much drama.
The attack was disappointing, but it's good that it has improved.
I hope that better fraud tactics come out sooner.
i just only wanna really good tactic to enjoy fm op for opserving
and i hope my favorite player gets all the awards with good stats.
Wasnt an attack dude, I am new to the forum. I didnt notice that u quoted westhammer. Another guys in the forum said the same thing. Idk why u guys are cmming after me because this facts. What I said still true tbh.
So if you don’t have anything better to do, simply enjoy the game and appreciate the good tactics you have access to in this game!
I want a moderador to check this out, I simply made an observation and this guy is attacking me out of nowwhere? @Droid
It's from one of the SI match engine guys trying to emulate Mourinho's Porto. I tried to tweak his tatic based on what u guys are producing here and I managed to get some of the results attached. I would like to try this kind of assymetry on ur algoritmic pattern.
There are two tactics, one is a underdog version.
Ty