Zippo said: unfortunately, "unexpected" has happened... during a migration process of the testing database an error happened so it may take one or two days to fix it Expand
You guys are doing a great job to test fast and as accurate as possible every tactic people present here! I have a suggestion to make, that may give us a better feeling for every match engine probably. it would be really nice if you include on the tests the presets of the fm on every match engine change, that can tell us if the ME tweaks helped to improve the tactics overall offensively/defensively from previous patches (or even fm versions in the future), as the presets have the same instructions with the previous fms and will probably stay the same in the future too
4231 11 roles is a tactic i created for fun at the start, but with some tweaks inspired by zaz tactics and tweaks the results seemed interesting and i d like to see this thing tested.
of course any1 interested to get this and tweak it, feel free to do it
22.2 is up (Match Engine 21.3.0.0: - Near post corners made less effective - Various fixes in different areas to defending teams keeping possession too well and inflating possession stats to unrealistic levels - Fixed goalkeepers not being marked during attacking set pieces - Tweaks to throw-ins - Number of other improvements to overall engine balance) grab your pens boys, we drawing tacts again
this is a 451V/433 positive tactic, medium-high intensity. no extreme gegenpress like most of the meta. would like to see peoples results with it, won the double (league+cup) in greece with a predicted 4 team (panathinaikos). i did play all games. no holiday test
ZaZ said: I just thought about making a log of discoveries from my tests, so people avoid testing the same things. To be clear, I'll be posting what works and what doesn't work under the conditions of my testing, but results could be different under different conditions. Feel free to share your findings here too.
- AF-At performs better than SS-At. - W-Su performs similar to DW-Su. - W-Su on AML/R position didn't perform well. - WB-Su on WBR/L position didn't perform well. - Very High tempo performs better than neutral tempo. - WCB-Su didn't perform well. - Press much more often performs better than neutral pressing. - Much higher line of engagement performs better than neutral line of engagement. - Neutral passing performs better than more direct passing or shorter passing. - Take more risks performs better than not take more risks. - Very attacking mentality performs better than positive, which performs better than attacking. - Neutral width performs better than narrow or wide. - WCB-De performs better than WCB-Su. - CM-At instead of DW-Su has similar performance. - IW-At instead of DW-Su has better performance. Expand
The point cm-at instead of dw-su... Is it correct? Or mistyping?
holiday tested
You guys are doing a great job to test fast and as accurate as possible every tactic people present here! I have a suggestion to make, that may give us a better feeling for every match engine probably. it would be really nice if you include on the tests the presets of the fm on every match engine change, that can tell us if the ME tweaks helped to improve the tactics overall offensively/defensively from previous patches (or even fm versions in the future), as the presets have the same instructions with the previous fms and will probably stay the same in the future too
of course any1 interested to get this and tweak it, feel free to do it
(Match Engine 21.3.0.0:
- Near post corners made less effective
- Various fixes in different areas to defending teams keeping possession too well and inflating possession stats to unrealistic levels
- Fixed goalkeepers not being marked during attacking set pieces
- Tweaks to throw-ins
- Number of other improvements to overall engine balance)
grab your pens boys, we drawing tacts again
Didn't bother with the set pieces and training, so it has opportunities for improvements in the future
Thanks for the info, maybe i missed it
- AF-At performs better than SS-At.
- W-Su performs similar to DW-Su.
- W-Su on AML/R position didn't perform well.
- WB-Su on WBR/L position didn't perform well.
- Very High tempo performs better than neutral tempo.
- WCB-Su didn't perform well.
- Press much more often performs better than neutral pressing.
- Much higher line of engagement performs better than neutral line of engagement.
- Neutral passing performs better than more direct passing or shorter passing.
- Take more risks performs better than not take more risks.
- Very attacking mentality performs better than positive, which performs better than attacking.
- Neutral width performs better than narrow or wide.
- WCB-De performs better than WCB-Su.
- CM-At instead of DW-Su has similar performance.
- IW-At instead of DW-Su has better performance.
The point cm-at instead of dw-su... Is it correct? Or mistyping?
w-at performed better than w-su (on mr/l positions)
for me