alexej
harvestgreen22 said: 466:[Quickness][Physical][Attacking] Additional focus: Ball Control
excel
https://mega.nz/file/NNsQ0QaC#tudRNF9uhPed_1ZYrFoesMZofeHD1Odt3E3rerqej_U
https://pixeldrain.com/u/ZU6qjh58




To put it simply:
331
[Physical][Match Practice][Attacking][Defending]

Training Intensity Scheduling  set as "no schedule, no schedule, no schedule, double intensity, double intensity"

Addtional Focus  set as "Quickness "


From what I gather from the Excel, Goalkeepers' individual should be set to Agility and Balance?
Tweaks
All credit goes to "A Smile" on this site. I just happened to notice Attacking mentality has worked better since the retests.
positive apparently works
tweaks
AWB got nerfed, so I'm experimenting with wingers based on ED FALL. This weirdly did better than the original
First attempt at a tactic in .3
550EXP showed great potential, so I am fiddling around with it.
AM - CHM
I seem to do extremely well when a player is sent off and I remove the SS from the pitch. This is my attempt at recreating it. Interested to see if it makes a difference to goals conceded aswell. Based on Barbie V1. Must mention I was QPR in the previous season.
I always enjoy seeing you experiment with something new
Testing how attacking mentality differs
Testing OOP differences
I got curious and started messing with tactics on the site. Did well in the league with United. If it does well, I will give credits, but I assume that it will score in the 70-80 range. As you can see, both domestic cups lost with losses to Charlton and Bournemouth
Re-uploaded
Gerrard said: It was set up on the new match engine 26.1

yes but fmarena tested it on the previous patch, did they not?
Also hilarious we have a tactic that hits 86 an hour after a new match engine patch comes out
jameswb2112 said: Hi Knap, do you know if there will be a different table for the new patch or will the current one still continue? Thanks.

There almost certainly will be a new tab as they do with every match engine update
Zippo said: Hi,

No, it's tactic specific.

For some reason the author assigned the striker to play the CM. It's purely his choice(or just a mistake) we can't do nothing about.

In the future there'll be many tactics where you see that warning but that's by design.


ah okay they must have messed up when submiting then as the screenshot has the FR become a PCM
@Zippo  looks to me like that same oop bug happened here
Zippo said: Thank for reporting the issue!

We've applied a fix to our tactic testing server that prevents it from happening.


No problem and thank you for the quick fix. Are tactics effected by the bug such as this one going to be retested for more accurate scores? Appreciate all the hard work you've been putting in!