Its been tested many times. I can't compete with the top tactics of FM21 and it seem that TFF is missing in action.

Alright, ran three tests which should give some statistic stability at least (240 games)

Overall, the tactic is very good for stronger teams and has a good balance of attacking and defending. When looking at mid-table teams with CA140 or less, this tactic does not work as well as some others and is conceding too much. While offensively it still works very well, it really starts to struggle in the back.

I would say this is as good if not better than ZaZ Red for better teams but definitely worse for mid-and low table teams.

Averages
Position CA165: 1
Position CA140: 17.6
Goals CA165: 193.33
Goals CA140: 178.33
Conceded CA165: 70.33
Conceded CA140: 174.33

Test 1


Test 2


Test 3


Avera

testing now. Will run a couple before posting

cadoni said: CA means nothing if attributes is not right. For example you can have CA140 DC player with 4 at marking and you can have CA140 DC player with 17 at marking. Expand

The ratings are obviously role-specific and utilize real players that play in those positions. But just like in real life, you won't ever have the perfect set of players

ZaZ said: I did a second version of Green with high tempo. Can you please test it for me, @healmuth? I think it might work well for top team, but bad for weaker team, because it would need good players to work.

Expand
promising

V2 and V3 are producing worse results for me in testing

V2


The best I have found is the AP/DM edit i suggested in regards to consistency

I've done three runs with this. It seems to work well for better teams but pretty poor results with the CA140 team.

No bad but definitely not as solid as Red and Blue

I've tried a few things with this tactic. The setting that worked the most consistent in testing so far has been a DM/AP combo. Here are some results over three runs of the test league, 80 games per season, so 240 games total.

Oh yeah, not stressing. Both are great tactics - i just find it interesting to find out what nuances actually make a difference.

I'll run them a couple of times side-by-side

ZaZ Red vs Phoenix

Very good offensively with all teams. Interestingly seems to struggle more defensively with weaker/mid tier teams even thou the overall setup is less aggressive than Phoenix

Looking good for strong teams but not so good (pretty bad) for weak teams

Good results, tactic seems to be a bit more suited for more advanced teams and the defense seems slightly worse in comparison to Phoenix

Doesn't look bad but certainly not as stable as Phoenix and Red

This looks very promising and very good.
- All players frozen
- CA140 set to 140 capability, 165 set to 165
- All Match Prep set to 100
- Knaps corner instructions from Dukes 443 V4 applied

Testing this right now in the MrL test league and will post results soon, I have utilized knap's corners instructions

Test League with Frozen Players and CA 165 players Club and CA 140 players Club

Could you guys add this to the testing schedule?

After testing, the DLP in combination with Wingers seems even better and the Wingers are now also scoring a lot more vs. just providing assists. Ive updated the original upload