Uploaded Date
|
Downloads
|
|
---|---|---|
Jan 24, 2023
|
31,195
|
Patch 23.5.0 tests
Patch 23.2.0 tests
Create an account or log in to leave a comment
4132 Extreme Diamond undervolt II
Changelog:
+Drop off more
+More disciplined
ARE ZOUMA 40 GOALS REAL? CONGRATULATIONS
abdullah said: ARE ZOUMA 40 GOALS REAL? CONGRATULATIONS
You should check III
Good job! New top tactic!!
Who to designate to take corners?
I notice the corner routines are different from left side to right side, is this intended?
Lsully95 said: I notice the corner routines are different from left side to right side, is this intended?
Yes, there is even a full explanation on another thread always with 4132 diamond
Texany said: Who to designate to take corners?
Let it "auto" don't nothing the ia will take the best anyway
Well done Delicious! Finally something different than 424 on top of the table. Can't wait to try it. Keep up the good work
I can see the improvements already. My RCB(Ostigard) scored in all 3 games after I changed my tactic. I am going to update at the end of the season.
bravo and thanks for giving it a nice name
Congrats, looks good, will give it a go now. How much do you think the set pieces are part of the improved score/goal difference?
Gratz, I like the shape.
Pip said: Congrats, looks good, will give it a go now. How much do you think the set pieces are part of the improved score/goal difference?
I like to believe it played a big part but i am waiting other results to be sure :P.
I've reworked even the set-pieces on defensive free-kicks and stuff
Delicious said: I like to believe it played a big part but i am waiting other results to be sure :P.
I've reworked even the set-pieces on defensive free-kicks and stuff
Yeah would be interesting to see them applied to other top tatics and see if there is a big impact.
Pip said: Yeah would be interesting to see them applied to other top tatics and see if there is a big impact.
i am testing those set pieces since like 10 test ago.. I don't think they make that huge difference in test, but we will see
So if I had a good striker with high jumping heading etc, I swap him with the DCR will it still have same effectiveness?
What kind of players would be ideal for the IW positions? Just normal offensive wingers?
Pip said: So if I had a good striker with high jumping heading etc, I swap him with the DCR will it still have same effectiveness?
Try it with haaland or something similar and you gonna tell us !
kjordafen said: What kind of players would be ideal for the IW positions? Just normal offensive wingers?
Guess so, but finding really good wingers ain't easy
Delicious said: Try it with haaland or something similar and you gonna tell us !
On a journeyman career atm. In my 2nd job managing Union Saint-Gilloise! Trying to sign Lorenzo Lucca so will update you!
Delicious said: i am testing those set pieces since like 10 test ago.. I don't think they make that huge difference in test, but we will see
Most issues I generally have with imported set pieces are attacking throw ins. When you lose the ball and get hit by a counter attack because everyone is way out of position. Not sure how much that is tinkered with.
As far as corners go it made a huge difference for me when I added both near post and far post routines on both sides. Just near post scored maybe 5 per season, when I added far post the number went up to 15, most are still scored from near post like 10 vs 5 or so. It's as if variety is more effective than sticking to "the best" routine over and over. Could be just anecdotal, I've played quite a bit with both option but obviously nowhere near the testing levels.
Yarema said: Most issues I generally have with imported set pieces are attacking throw ins. When you lose the ball and get hit by a counter attack because everyone is way out of position. Not sure how much that is tinkered with.
As far as corners go it made a huge difference for me when I added both near post and far post routines on both sides. Just near post scored maybe 5 per season, when I added far post the number went up to 15, most are still scored from near post like 10 vs 5 or so. It's as if variety is more effective than sticking to "the best" routine over and over. Could be just anecdotal, I've played quite a bit with both option but obviously nowhere near the testing levels.
So you getting hard life because of thrown-in? What kind of setup you using? BTW this can be fixed, that's a good feedback Ty!
What are the instructions for people playing on Xbox well done for hitting 62
Delicious said: So you getting hard life because of thrown-in? What kind of setup you using? BTW this can be fixed, that's a good feedback Ty!
I can't remember exactly because I changed them when I conceded a few goals like that. A few of those routines with 2 CBs in opposition box and like 4 players near the throw in taker to supposedly cross. What happened was either the cross got headed away with a quick counter following or the crosser already lost the ball with same effect. Not that it happened every game, but chances given were very high quality and I felt using the routine was harmful overall.
there was an update, it impacted several formations did it change the performance of this one?
BRUUUNOOOHHH said: there was an update, it impacted several formations did it change the performance of this one?
there wasn't M.E. update yesterday, and it's still v23.1.0
This tactic offers a really nice game!
BRUUUNOOOHHH said: there was an update, it impacted several formations did it change the performance of this one?
It reseted the morale and stuff so that's why players are facing "something is off"
Any OIs?
metalhead said: Any OIs?
Nop didn't go there yet. But i will check them one day but i don't think there is a ever-green solution about OIs