From DB2.0 to DB3.0, some tactical test results showed paradoxes, including some PI test comparisons. I wonder if part of the reason is that the 400 test results are not accurate enough?
In the previous online game, the effect of this tactic choosing IWBS is completely inferior to choosing FBS, which is a very poor result in both offense and defense. The same was true in the tactics of 4312 Master Zhou Zhou FB Tweak, but Arena's test results were the exact opposite of online matches. Is IWBS a better choice in tactics against AI?
We've updated the testing league and made changes that increase the difficulty in the league, now tactics should be more efficient to come on top and also, the changes reduce the RNG which improves the accuracy of the results. Expand
First of all, thank you for your hard work. However, I don't think RNG is any different, this can be seen by the upper and lower limits of the score presented, still generally between 2 and 3, while the more difficult score and the number of tests also offset each other's bonus. There were also nearly identical tactical test results, such as the Problem Solvin V18 and the 424 Classic CBP87 v1.8. RNG is closely related to the number of test venues, and the effectiveness of these three tactical test reforms is only regressive in terms of RNG. I think the accuracy of the test results still needs more test matches to improve, and the tactics with higher scores need to unify the test matches, whether it is 4800 or 9600. Even that doesn't really tell the difference between two nearly identical tactics.
Before the main battle was FBA and WBA, CWB seems to be slightly inferior. In terms of functions, WB and CWB are at the same level, while FBA is similar to WBS and CWBS.
Change:FBA→WBA. Regardless of PVE or PVP, there doesn't seem to be any difference in the use of FBA and WBA in the same tactic, but the previous Arena test results showed that FBA is better. Let's see if that's true in this tactic.
CBP87 said: @A Smile props to you for this mate, I love the variation you've set with the PIs. Great work mate Expand
Thanks for your praise, SI will not change the current race engine, we will have to work on the engine that is almost studied. I think we're aiming for 70 now, so let's work together.
From DB2.0 to DB3.0, some tactical test results showed paradoxes, including some PI test comparisons. I wonder if part of the reason is that the 400 test results are not accurate enough?
In the previous online game, the effect of this tactic choosing IWBS is completely inferior to choosing FBS, which is a very poor result in both offense and defense. The same was true in the tactics of 4312 Master Zhou Zhou FB Tweak, but Arena's test results were the exact opposite of online matches. Is IWBS a better choice in tactics against AI?
PI simplification.
So that the left and right sides have the same coordination.
We've updated the testing league and made changes that increase the difficulty in the league, now tactics should be more efficient to come on top and also, the changes reduce the RNG which improves the accuracy of the results.
First of all, thank you for your hard work. However, I don't think RNG is any different, this can be seen by the upper and lower limits of the score presented, still generally between 2 and 3, while the more difficult score and the number of tests also offset each other's bonus. There were also nearly identical tactical test results, such as the Problem Solvin V18 and the 424 Classic CBP87 v1.8.
RNG is closely related to the number of test venues, and the effectiveness of these three tactical test reforms is only regressive in terms of RNG. I think the accuracy of the test results still needs more test matches to improve, and the tactics with higher scores need to unify the test matches, whether it is 4800 or 9600. Even that doesn't really tell the difference between two nearly identical tactics.
Before the main battle was FBA and WBA, CWB seems to be slightly inferior. In terms of functions, WB and CWB are at the same level, while FBA is similar to WBS and CWBS.
Regardless of PVE or PVP, there doesn't seem to be any difference in the use of FBA and WBA in the same tactic, but the previous Arena test results showed that FBA is better. Let's see if that's true in this tactic.
maybe 2 RGAs.
DL:FBA→FBS
Change：
DMRC:RGA→BWMD
DR:FBA→WBA
Thanks for your praise, SI will not change the current race engine, we will have to work on the engine that is almost studied. I think we're aiming for 70 now, so let's work together.