A Smile
A double asymmetric attack of the Brazilian box and the 424.
Underlap→Overlap,Vols add "Get Further Forward"
See if the setup Delicious used in the Brazilian box can produce better results in this formation.
"P" is used, but more importantly to see what happens when "Pass Into Space" is removed.
T+RMD,Keep weakening the defense.
Jae said: Promising that! Gonna give it a go with 2 T's and an AF up top.

I just tried RMD+T:D
The use of the 'T' earned the league a holiday record of 171 goals and 121 goal difference, but the 50 conceded goals also reflected little defensive ability in this duty.
Smigo08 said: Can this be ran with Cross more often on the wing backs, they seem to get into some nice positions but don't cross.

Absolutely, in fact, many of the minor details set up in the tactical test result are not even as significant as the randomness of the test itself. But if you're playing on your own, these small changes can have a real impact depending on the attributes of your players.
Is a balanced mindset more appropriate?
Turn right back to “Underlap”.
Change:
Remove“Focus Play Down The Left"and“Focus Play Down The Right"
"Underlap"→"Overlap"
MEZ(A)→AP(A)

In contrast, although MEZA's attack is a little stronger, APA's defense and coordination ability are better.
Compare with Ⅳ
add“Focus Play Down The Left"and“Focus Play Down The Right"

Under the Underlap option, side wing attacks should be better.
Compare with II
MCL and MCR: AP(A)→MEZ(A)
left and right: Overlap→Underlap
Compare with II
MCR: AP(A)→MEZ(A)
The right: Overlap→Underlap

It seems to work well.
Sounds good. Look how it turned out.
sponsorkindest said: nice one!

I just didn't realize the WBA was so much better than the WBS. I thought it was even.
sponsorkindest said: nice one!

We want to go together, I really did not see you do the tactics to follow, I tested AP+CAR, CAR+CAR, test the overlap and underlap of different sides, in the limited own test came to the conclusion that AP+AP is better. When I logged in to post and saw that you had posted this formation, ha
WBS→WBA
Changing from WBS to WBA means that the defense has dropped below the pass line, so can 1 attack +1 pivot defeat 1 defense? It should feel about the same.
Is WBS better or WBA better?
Win in chaos.
WBA has always worked well with AF edging.