We want to go together, I really did not see you do the tactics to follow, I tested AP+CAR, CAR+CAR, test the overlap and underlap of different sides, in the limited own test came to the conclusion that AP+AP is better. When I logged in to post and saw that you had posted this formation, ha
WBS→WBA Changing from WBS to WBA means that the defense has dropped below the pass line, so can 1 attack +1 pivot defeat 1 defense? It should feel about the same.
Remove“Focus Play Down The Left"and“Focus Play Down The Right"
"Underlap"→"Overlap"
MEZ(A)→AP(A)
In contrast, although MEZA's attack is a little stronger, APA's defense and coordination ability are better.
add“Focus Play Down The Left"and“Focus Play Down The Right"
Under the Underlap option, side wing attacks should be better.
MCL and MCR: AP(A)→MEZ(A)
left and right: Overlap→Underlap
MCR: AP(A)→MEZ(A)
The right: Overlap→Underlap
It seems to work well.
I just didn't realize the WBA was so much better than the WBS. I thought it was even.
We want to go together, I really did not see you do the tactics to follow, I tested AP+CAR, CAR+CAR, test the overlap and underlap of different sides, in the limited own test came to the conclusion that AP+AP is better. When I logged in to post and saw that you had posted this formation, ha
Changing from WBS to WBA means that the defense has dropped below the pass line, so can 1 attack +1 pivot defeat 1 defense? It should feel about the same.
This change brought some offensive enhancement and some defensive loss.
Give up part of the defense and strengthen the offense.