From DB2.0 to DB3.0, some tactical test results showed paradoxes, including some PI test comparisons. I wonder if part of the reason is that the 400 test results are not accurate enough?
In the previous online game, the effect of this tactic choosing IWBS is completely inferior to choosing FBS, which is a very poor result in both offense and defense. The same was true in the tactics of 4312 Master Zhou Zhou FB Tweak, but Arena's test results were the exact opposite of online matches. Is IWBS a better choice in tactics against AI?
remove underlaps.
Can you try to add it for retesting again?
If you still have an issue then let us know.
Thanks.
Thanks for your reply, now the BUG has been fixed.
Add some mainstream TI and PI.
From DB2.0 to DB3.0, some tactical test results showed paradoxes, including some PI test comparisons. I wonder if part of the reason is that the 400 test results are not accurate enough?
In the previous online game, the effect of this tactic choosing IWBS is completely inferior to choosing FBS, which is a very poor result in both offense and defense. The same was true in the tactics of 4312 Master Zhou Zhou FB Tweak, but Arena's test results were the exact opposite of online matches. Is IWBS a better choice in tactics against AI?
PI simplification.