Did you test this formation with two ST on support and 2 wingers on attack? Expand
In fact, I have tested this tactic myself when uploading the Underlaps version before, including using it in online competitions. My conclusion is that overlap+underlap is slightly inferior, so I did not choose this at that time. The same tactical test of 4000 matches has an RNG of 0.5~1.5 just like arena said. From the screenshot of the test results, my understanding of RNG can be summed up in another layer, that is, it can only be said that the probability of RNG is 95% between 0.5~1.5, and the luck is good or bad enough will exceed this range. Of course, the probability of a 1200 test is much smaller and could kill some of the top tactics. For example, now we are more fine-tuning the 4231 tactics of the same player duty combination, whether it is a higher 64 points or a lower 59 points, the difference between them may be very small, under the influence of double RNG led to this result.
Did you test this formation with two ST on support and 2 wingers on attack? Expand
Hi,dzek. Yes, I tested it. I uploaded the setting of Balance mentality +Underlaps before, scoring 62. I think it would be better to adopt the setting of attacking+overlaps. My summary of the current engine is that two or three ST's are usually better for a balanced mindset, though this combination like you said may be one of the exceptions.
This combination seems to be less stable, possibly because the combination of defensive midfielders lacks protection for the midfield, and see what the result is.
Cherknam said: Do you have any idea which attributes are best for PF (su)? Not sure whether it'd be the same as AF or different ones because of its different PIs. Expand
I think in addition to the characteristics of AF to pay extra attention to the two attributes of aggression and bravery. Sorry, it's a little difficult for translation software to discuss this topic.
Did you test this formation with two ST on support and 2 wingers on attack?
In fact, I have tested this tactic myself when uploading the Underlaps version before, including using it in online competitions. My conclusion is that overlap+underlap is slightly inferior, so I did not choose this at that time. The same tactical test of 4000 matches has an RNG of 0.5~1.5 just like arena said. From the screenshot of the test results, my understanding of RNG can be summed up in another layer, that is, it can only be said that the probability of RNG is 95% between 0.5~1.5, and the luck is good or bad enough will exceed this range. Of course, the probability of a 1200 test is much smaller and could kill some of the top tactics.
For example, now we are more fine-tuning the 4231 tactics of the same player duty combination, whether it is a higher 64 points or a lower 59 points, the difference between them may be very small, under the influence of double RNG led to this result.
Did you test this formation with two ST on support and 2 wingers on attack?
Hi,dzek. Yes, I tested it. I uploaded the setting of Balance mentality +Underlaps before, scoring 62. I think it would be better to adopt the setting of attacking+overlaps. My summary of the current engine is that two or three ST's are usually better for a balanced mindset, though this combination like you said may be one of the exceptions.
DR:WBA→FBA
Add "Underlap Right"
Underlap Right→Overlap Right
Check to see if "passing Into Space" is really more necessary.
I think in addition to the characteristics of AF to pay extra attention to the two attributes of aggression and bravery. Sorry, it's a little difficult for translation software to discuss this topic.