Geek
ClaudeJ said: Hey there,
I haven't been able to find what are the Default attributes.
Is it documented somewhere ?
Cheers


You can download a game save at the bottom of the OP - https://fm-arena.com/thread/2712-fm23-fm-arena-tactic-testing-league/
sponsorkindest said: dumb question, do you need the in-game editor to use FMRTE or FMRTE standalone is fine to edit stuff?

FMRTE is standalone but there're some things that can be edited only via FMRTE and some thing that can be edited only via the official in game editor so it's very handy to have both
White Europe said: Yes me too, my logic tells me that good positioning can allow CD's to be slower.

Actually, "Player 1" will be faster because Acceleration is only how fast a player can reach his top Pace and if a player has Pace = 1 then he could have Acceleration 20 but he still will be as slows as a turtle because Acceleration only helps reaching the top Pace faster but if his Pace is 1 then even 20 Acceleration won't help he still will be very slow.
White Europe said: Who would you buy?
Player 1, all highlighted attributes for CD position 15, pace and acceleration 12
Player 2, all highlighted attributes for CD position 12, pace and acceleration 15?


I would go for "Player 1"
Fisa said: Hello, are you playing all matches on balanced or are you switching to something else against better teams like Manchester City? And what about weak teams are you going to switch to a positive or attacking mentality?

I play on Balanced and I only change it when I need this this - https://fm-arena.com/thread/3241-adjusting-the-intensity-of-your-tactic-during-matches/
Delicious said: Can you write the changelog? So i know what did you tested!

GJ as always


I guess the changelog would look something like this:

- Underlaps w/o focus down the flanks + IFs on Attack
- Standard Defense Line
- the left DM with Defensive Midfielder role and added "Take More Risk" PI
- Reworked Set Pieces
Hi,

This is another attempt to improve my favorite 4-2-4 formation.

As always this tactic is based on various great tactics by @Delicious, @Blau, @Steelwood and other great tactics here.

All credit should go to these great guys for their amazing work, I just made few tweaks here and there.

I hope this tactic works well for you.

Thanks.





4-2-4 is my favorite formation :)

This tactic looks great

Tsubasa said: 4-2-4 is my favorite formation, I just love it :)

Newcastle, 1st season


Thanks!

I'm also a big fan of 4-2-4 formation and I'm very happy to see it's working well.
Hi,

This tactic is based on tactics by @Delicious, @Blau, @Steelwood and other great tacticians here.

All credit should go to these great guys for their amazing work, I just made few tweaks here and there.

I hope this tactic works well for you.

Thanks.





Delicious said: why it got re-tested ?_?

I asked @Zippo for a few extra runs

but unfortunately, it didn't hold the score of 63pts and dropped to 62pts :cry:
Hi,

This tactic is based on tactics by @Delicious, @Blau, @Steelwood and other great tacticians here.

All credit should go to these great guys for their amazing work, I just made few tweaks here and there.

I hope this tactic works well for you.

Thanks.





srdmeister said: My only problem is with red cards, I get them a lot. Which position should I swap when I am down to 10 men? What do you recommend?

I think removing one of the 3 strikers would be an option decision in that case.
dzek said: He is moderator in SI official forum named "Rashidi". Everything he drops out it's confirmed by SI, at least the most out of them. You can test it by your own. I just try to help.

He is just a moderator and not SI employ, he gets the information in the same way as we do and we don't know we did say to him and how he understood it.

Also, what he's saying on the video is very vague and you really can't learn anything specific from it.
dzek said: @Delicious, as SI has confirmed

Please, no need to confuse people saying that SI has confirmed anything when they don't.
dzek said: @Geek & @Delicious you can see here.

First of all, the guy on the video isn't an SI employ.

He just says his vision on the subject.

He was asked whether SI confirmed his "theory" and he didn't answer anything.

dzek said: @Delicious, as SI has confirmed, "Take More Risk" is more about the decision that the individual player makes about how risky his moves and passes will be. So given that, we could add this PI(at least to the strikers) to improve "Pass Into Space" even more, of course with the downside of passing the ball unnecessarily forward if you don't have the right players to do so. :)

Where did they confirm anything?

I still believe that "Pass Into Space" and "Take More Risk" do the same thing, they encourage players do more pass into space



opq said: or even stay with this 433, but don't be greedy and protect the lead :) just dropping mentality and make some player going support\defend or even deeper on pitch usually helps

Nahh... the shape is too attacking, dropping mentality won't help, it requires changing the shape to something more defensive and 4-4-2 fits very well because only what you need to do is subbing one striker for DM and that's all.
FreddyAdu said: Awesome stuff! Do you use some other tactic to close down the game in the final minutes? I just used this tactic to go 3-1 up against PSG in the 86th minute only to the concede 4 goals on stoppage time... I'm playing with a Swedish side btw so a 2 goal defeat was still a good result but it was quite the collapse at the end there.

You can use this tactic when you need to close down the game - https://fm-arena.com/thread/4601-442-sambo-or-jiu-jitsu-viii/

It conceded only 47 goals which makes it one of the best defense in the test

Also, if you want to make it even more defensive then change the duty of the Volante to Support and drop 1 Striker to AM
Floppyaams said: And I am sorry, but what is a OI?

Some people believe OIs can help and some people think it's a placebo

Btw, the OIs have been tested - https://fm-arena.com/thread/4534-424-extreme-volts-iv-opposition-instructions/