just a quick run of @A Smile's 4231 to check the difference in the output between double pivot + AM setup and DM-CM-CM on the current ME guess this one should perform worse, but I'm ok if the difference won't be too high
433 with overloading only on right flank created mostly for Pool due to Trent's "switch flanks" PPM, but since my test save is created with City I leave it as it is
Middleweight165 said: What is the etiquette of testing tactics published by other authors on different sites? Of course referencing them as the author and not claiming the tactic as my own. I'm thinking of the well known names in the community who always publish successful tactics and it would be nice to compare them against the tactics here. Is it allowed? Expand
is at any better now?
underlaps + WBs cutting inside
and balanced mentality is a bonus imo, especially if ur playing for a mediocre team
LB and AMR roles are quite questionable tho
guess this one should perform worse, but I'm ok if the difference won't be too high
mentality Att -> Balance
DLP + DM on central trio
credits to @A Smile and @letsgo9
created mostly for Pool due to Trent's "switch flanks" PPM, but since my test save is created with City I leave it as it is
passing on standard since I don't see much difference this year between shorter and standard + Work ball into box TI
plus basic CMs with only "Move into channels" PI
@Delicious will be happy xD
Over 100 Attacking
or that's just randomness due to just 1200 matches being played currently
plus overall team width on 3/4
this one is 433 with an inverted central trio
there's an option for this
and it looks like this: https://fm-arena.com/thread/4882-stephenhk-s-shaolin-4123-v5-1/
p.s. can't speak about etiquette, but it looks OK to me to put a tactic for testing, if some author doesn't post here