Using ideas from Flanker into a pseudo-narrow formation. Included the attacking and much higher line instructions even though I do not like them for actual gameplay.
The game doesn't make it clear how it treats the instruction with three guys on each flank. Overlap seemed to play better somehow. If this abomination of a tactic is any good, I will probably submit an underlap test on FMArena.
Same as v1.1 but with an attacking mentality. Plays like a 442 in defense and a 343 in attack
I think most of my tactics will score higher on FMArena with a much higher defensive line. However, I do not like how it plays in-game. I don't think it suits most player teams and leads to worse in-game performance so I am not going to include it. If anybody wants to test any of my tactics with a much higher d-line on FMArena they are more than welcome to .
Balanced mentality
No Overlaps/Underlaps
IWBs on support
There's a lot of RNG with the 1200 game tests. I wouldn't look too deep into it
-Much Higher Lines -> Higher
Overlaps -> Underlaps
The game doesn't make it clear how it treats the instruction with three guys on each flank. Overlap seemed to play better somehow. If this abomination of a tactic is any good, I will probably submit an underlap test on FMArena.
Attacking -> Balanced
W -> IW
AM-S -> AM-A
WB-A -> WB-S
I think most of my tactics will score higher on FMArena with a much higher defensive line. However, I do not like how it plays in-game. I don't think it suits most player teams and leads to worse in-game performance so I am not going to include it. If anybody wants to test any of my tactics with a much higher d-line on FMArena they are more than welcome to