letsgo9
Balanced mentality improved? Noice
macca72 said: If you would like a little tweak that I think makes this tactic slightly better, drop the middle striker to the AM position and have a play around with roles. AP / SS / T all work brilliantly...

You should put it on a test man
Based on 424 deformation AM2. Changed the VOL (A) to VOL (S).
110 points LOL, 36/2/0
Based on Brazilian box FT1.

Added an overlap on the left side
Based on 424 deformation AM. Focus play on right added too.
Based on Brazilian box FT1. Focus on the right flank added as well.
Decided to bring some asymetry upfront with the strikers, changed VOL (S) to VOL (A);
Tweak the right flank with stay wider PI
testing the BWD (D) + VOL (A) duo
Based on 4231 golden mean. Want to check if the score improves when u setup focus on flanks on the builder side.
dzek said: 2.400 matches?

reduced the score by 1 point, btw
Still checking on the SS effect in 424 deformation. After other's ppl results im starting to move deeper on the asymetry effect on tactics.
Trying to check the SS effect on Joga bonito box IW v3
Trying to measure somehow the asymmetry effect on Brazilian box PI Galore and 424 deformation
ffs
Based on 424 deformation. I pushed the VOL (A) to the AM (S) role. I wanna check if somehow the 4132 can work like did in the past.
Based on 424 deformation but IW in this setup seems kinda off. @A Smile probably alrdy tested this b4 post the meta tactic. Anyway I think we should give it a try
Maybe Focus on flanks are just for finishers instead of builders.
@dzek I have to trust more in my feelings, I should kept testing stuff lmao
I lack methodology XDDDDDDD
alexej said: Can someone tell me if downloading tactics will also take their set piece routines? Thanks

I guess we are delegating the Set pieces to Man City assistant manager. In that case Guardiola's one, Juanma Lillo.
It's 424 deformation but with some roles adjustments:

- right WB (A) -> IWB (S)
- SS -> AM (A)

Cheers,
sponsorkindest said: No underlap or overlap. I have my doubts :D

That's the point with IFs