(Tackle harder for all positions except goalkeeper) BCB and ACB: Take more risks WBs: Stay wider, cross from byline, shoot less often AM: Move into channels CHM: Move into channels, shoot less often IW and IF: Get further forward, Stay wider, cut inside, cross from byline IW mark DL, IF mark DR SS: Move into channels
CBP87 said: Nevertheless, Diaboliq is still based on someone elses base tactic/work whether that be Knap/Gerrard or Korean creators. The whole purpose of these tests are not for people to out do each other, its so that we as a community can come up with the best possible tactic, some may even say, come up a tactic that breaks the ME (I would love that by the way). Now regardless if you feel this tactic is 90% of your work is irrelevant in my opinion, he has added something that has increased the test score and has shown us that something can work like the ACB role and I am pretty sure the rules of this site are if 2 or more changes have been made to the base tactic then you don't have to mention the base tactic creator or tactic, you can class it as your own. Come on mate, its Christmas, ligthen up Expand
And even so I've been using the ACB role in most of the tactics I've posted and looking at the differences between the 2, there are defensive PI changes on the players other than just simply changing the back 3 offensive roles, and there are differences in the team instructions as well
Changes: - Changed PCM to CM in out of possession - Moved 2 strikers down to AMs in out of possession to turn into 4-1-3-2-0 - Changed defensive line to lower
Changes: - Changed GK distribution instructions - Reverted 'Run Wide With Ball' back to 'Cut inside with Ball' on FBs - Added 'More Direct Passing' to FBs
TheChamp said: @infxamus do you use any individual player instructions?
(Tackle harder for all positions except goalkeeper)
BCB and ACB: Take more risks
WBs: Stay wider, cross from byline, shoot less often
AM: Move into channels
CHM: Move into channels, shoot less often
IW and IF: Get further forward, Stay wider, cut inside, cross from byline
IW mark DL, IF mark DR
SS: Move into channels
And even so I've been using the ACB role in most of the tactics I've posted and looking at the differences between the 2, there are defensive PI changes on the players other than just simply changing the back 3 offensive roles, and there are differences in the team instructions as well
- Left IF to IW
- Changed right AM to CHM
- Changed ACB to BCB
Results:
- Moved left and right second striker to IFs
- Changed left and right BCBs to Advanced center backs
- Readded 'tackle harder' to midfielders
Results:
- Added 'Cross from byline' to WBs
- Removed 'tackle harder' from GK, AMs and second strikers
Results:
- Added 'take more risks' to advanced center back
Results:
- Front 3 all Second Strikers
- Midfield 2 changed from channel midfielder to attacking midfielder
- Removed 'make more runs' from AMs
Results:
- Left and right AMs are now shadow strikers
- Middle shadow striker now attacking midfielder
Results:
Results:
- Changed wingbacks to advanced wingbacks
Results:
- Changed middle BCB to Advanced Center Back
- Changed 'stay wider' to 'move into channels' on channel forwards
Results:
- Reverted previous changes
- Changed progress through 'both flanks' to 'balanced'
Results:
- Added 'Cross from byline' to WBs
- Changed player instruction 'stay wider' to 'move into channels' on left and right channel forward
Results:
Results:
- Added 'Invite Crosses'
- Added 'Prevent GK Short Distribution'
Results:
Tested with Man City
Results:
- Changed PCM to CM in out of possession
- Moved 2 strikers down to AMs in out of possession to turn into 4-1-3-2-0
- Changed defensive line to lower
Tested with Man City
- Added 'Take More Risks' to DMs
- Changed Attacking Midfielder to Advanced Playmaker
Results:
- Changed GK distribution instructions
- Reverted 'Run Wide With Ball' back to 'Cut inside with Ball' on FBs
- Added 'More Direct Passing' to FBs
Results: