infxamus
debelizec19 said: Thanks for the tip for Wirtz.
No, I am asking Your favorite players for each postion? :)


This list is not only based off attributes but also on personality and media handling, better personalities in the squad and not having negative media handling such as outspoken = higher team cohesion which = better play on the field

Each position/role has 2 premium players and 2 cheap players worth below 30 million
FM24 Top Players (Premium & Cheap).fmf
Downloaded : 390 times
Uploaded : Jun 16, 2024
Uefaaa said: Can you recommend any roles of central midfields to replace defensive midfields because I dont have any players can play defensive midfield roles or it won't be as good as an original one?

Putting the DMs as CMs would reduce the effectiveness of the tactic by a lot, I only recommend only putting 1 DM into a CM(S) role
debelizec19 said: @infxamus great tactic, congrats!!
What is your best eleven players for this tactic? And best eleven wonderkinds?
And what do you think about F.Wirtz on PF position?
Thank You very much :)


Since Wirtz is young you can retrain him at PF, but he is also capable and has a better position rating playing on the left wing

As for the best eleven, I can't know unless I see your team
Ajax said: hello set piece ?

I recommend to use Arena Best Hits or Azure V3
jaaqov said: Thanks mate, used the Problem Solvin V24 as well and those instructions you mentioned. Working like a charm - what would you suggest in terms of using One Shot vs. Problem Solvin? Just a matter of what players your team has or is Problim Solvin just more well rounded (and more match tested)?

Well, it depends on some things. For example if one of your best players on the team is an Attacking Midfielder (such as someone like Martin Odegaard, Bruno Fernandes, De Bruyne) and you want to use them to full effectiveness, then I would use One Shot. But if you just want to use the more effective tactic then use Problem Solvin and squad build around the tactic, it may mean selling that AM unless they can play as a PF, IF or DM (they have to be atleast a 'Accomplished' to play there).


Ravnica said: From your answer in Problem Solvin v24 thread about foot strength of inside forwards I made conclusion that in this tactic both inverted AML and AMR must have Very Strong right foot and left foot respectively. Is it correct assumption?

Yes you are correct

AML - Right Foot: Very Strong
AMR - Left Foot: Very Strong
MarcWatts said: what style is this like gegenpress or no?

Yes, aggressive high press


jaaqov said: I like this tac, thanks for sharing! Any tweaks you use for forcing goals or defending/ save some intensity when you got a good lead?

I recommend to click this link and follow the tactical changes
Changes:
- Added 'Hold Position' to left FB
- Right IF(S) to IF(A)



Results:


Seto said: I'm using thic tactic with amazing results that i'll share at the end of my first season. The only problem I'm having are the injuries. Can someone suggest me a good training schedules (the best one if is it possible)?

The training schedules I recommend are RDF Tactics training schedule, fccadoni's schedules or EBFM's training schedules

Or you can just use the generic 'Balanced' schedule given by the game.
lHollow said: What would be the best size for the field?

The default 115x74 field


Fmconsoleplayer said: How do you do fccandoni training on ps5 because it ain’t the same as pc there’s only presets

On a different device you have go to fccadoni's schedule look at them and copy it manually to console
Changes:
- Removed 'Cross More Often' on left FB
- IF(A) to IF(S)



Results:


Seto said: Should the winger play with inverted foot so right footed winger on left side and vice-versa or not?

Yes, for right wingers the minimum requirement for the left foot should be "Very strong" and for the left winger the minimum requirement for the right foot should be "Very Strong". If they're considered world class then what their preferred foot won't matter (like Foden for City)
Changes from the Volante + IW version:
- IWs to IFs
- Right AF to PF(S)
- Removed left underlap
- Removed 'Get Further Forward' on left FB
- Removed 'Hold Up Ball' on left IF
- Added 'Move into channels' on Segundo Volante



Results:


Problem Solvin, but using Inverted Wingers and a Segundo Volante



Results:


NeptriusS said: We must play this tactic in what mentality please?

Balanced mentality... only increase if you're losing at the end of a match
Changes:
- Attacking mentality to Positive mentality



Results:


Manidaro7 said: But what if I am losing and need to recover the result, what changes should I make to the tactics?

Increasing the mentality to attacking and/or pushing the FBs up to Wingbacks
Manidaro7 said: is there a version with lower intensity to protect the outcome when perhaps you are ahead? and again,is there a version perhaps more offensive to use when you are losing?

To protect a lead in the last 15 minutes try this:
- Lower tempo to 'standard'
- Tick on 'be more disciplined'
- Turn off 'counter-press'
- Turn off 'distribute quickly'
- Lower 'trigger press' to standard for players to hold position more
- Turn off 'Step Up More'
- Turn off 'Get Stuck In'
- Change Line Of Engagement to 'Mid Block'
- Lastly change the FBs from attack to support
- Add 'Hold Position' instruction to DMs (optional)

To try and find a score late try increasing the mentality to attacking and/or pushing the FBs up the field and become WBs


wolf said: opposition instructions are a must in all matches?

Me personally I don't use opposition instructions


Accross said: I was doing a super season, going for the title, now i think it's dead.

I even lost home i don't understand.


You can figure out what is going on by reading this thread
Alexandru said: How "balanced" approach works with this one?

It won’t be as good when playing on balanced mentality the scoring output will decrease, try changing to balanced when you have a big lead to decrease the intensity on the players
Changes:
- Fixed mistake where PF was marking DM(CL) instead of DM
- Removed 'Tackle Harder' from SK(S)



Results:


Changes:
- SK(D) to SK(S)



Results: