Sane
ZaZ said: Yes, and there was no statistical difference between. Actually, invite crosses was slightly better in some shapes, so I left to test again later.

This is interesting, I think people have not yet found the perfect instructions for reliable defense, which is why such low results of tactics. It can be combinations like high pressing, higher d-line, what kind of trap and something related to crosses. What do you think?
ZaZ said: I released Earth and Wind 2.0 recently. They weren't that great but gave me some good data to work with.

Zaz, have you tested instructions such as stop crosses and trap outside?
ZaZ said: Thank you for testing!

Have you tested trap inside and outside?
For some reason I don’t see this in tactics, although it seems to me that it works.
ZaZ said: Yes. I will try to get something different from the top tactics, because I don't think it helps much to test what has already been done.

Great idea, can we see a fire 2.0 update today or tomorrow?
ZaZ said: I give up on one DM for this tactic, I just can't make it work in this patch. I am going to start testing it with two DMs instead.

Two DMs and two AF?
@ZaZ you promised to release an update to your tactics very soon, how are you? Can't wait anymore)
As I understand it, this test shows that if one player condition dropped to 70%, then his performance decreased by about 2.9%, not so bad, right?
Guys, how to understand this test?

Would the performance difference be 15% worse for a player ranked in position 17 than a player ranked 20? Or 1.36% for one player and 15% if everyone has 17 instead of 20?
ZaZ said: Since so many good tactics are popping up, I'm not in such a hurry, so I'm taking my time to identify what works and what doesn't.

The current tactic may be updated to version 2.0 to test the results, plz?
ZaZ said: I finally identified what was causing my tactics to perform badly. Now I finally started moving forward again. Going to take a few days to post a new tactic, but results are promising.

Tell us, please, what exactly gave you a progress in results?
Zippo said: We'll test one more ( counter-press ) and back to tactic testing

Maybe still testing the offside trap? Logically, it should work well with pressure.
@ZaZ please share your current best tactics, while fm-arena is not testing
@Zippo, maybe you should at least alternate between a test of tactics and a test of instructions. It seems, that the test of instructions without communication with each other can be incorrect. And the instruction combination is too much, it will be difficult to check everything. For example, the Attacking mentality performed better than Positive, perhaps because it automatically increases tempo and pressure.

What do you think about this?
@ZaZ  how important is it for the player to have the same traits as the role? Will it greatly affect the win in the match?
@ZaZ how about making this post with the green tactic the same as the blue one?

I mean to make a full description of the tactics, different versions to hold and make your own player filter, because here it seems the players should perform slightly different functions.

Also, how much work can you do to improve this tactic to catch up with blue and score 65 on the test scoreboard?

I think the community would really appreciate it, because ZaZ - Green 5.0 (not SS) tactics are more suitable for real football and in many clubs players are more suitable for green than for blue, and in general for a long time in FM there were no equally excellent tactics with different arrangements and roles.

Respect for the work from the FM community)
Interesting, how you guess the influence of such non-obvious attributes, because in fm 21 there weren't even tests on it.
ZaZ said: You can sort the table by fewest goals conceded and pick the one you like. Fanecas and Snow Halation have good score and good defense. You can also use Blue 1.0 if you want.

Zaz, can update Blue tactic, because now this tactic is the worst of yours, but I think it has potential for 6.0+, and it is more realistic in games, your thoughts?
@ZaZ  How do you think this tactic is better than fanecas? Here are the differences between snow halation v3 tactics and Fanecas

1) IWB-At
2) DW-Su
3) One Pf, one AF
4) Or Positive mentality?
ZaZ said: I think tactics are being held back by horrible defenses. We have the same attack power as last year, but defense is way leakier.

Do you have any idea how to overcome 6 rating right now?
Can i change W-Su to IW-Su without losing the quality of the tactics?