Sane
ZaZ said: I am looking for a breakthrough, since I don't think change in roles or positions will increase score much further. I believe I have found some hints, but need to keep testing so I don't post some misleading thing.

Zaz, do you have something interesting new? Looking forward to updating your tactics
What kind of feet should players have? All left players - left foot, all right players - right foot?
ZaZ said: For my tactic, yes, but that could change in further tests.




I wouldn't say 40-50 points a season with Norwich is weak, but I am trying my best to improve these results. However, I don't think lower intensity will do any good, I would rather change the mentality or change a couple of roles.


Is IW-At still your best role? And what kind of working leg should IW-At have?

Or what other role can you use without dropping the result on the flank?
ZaZ said: I did a couple more of experiments and Red 0.4b seems better. In four runs, results for Manchester City were:
1. 94 pts, 89 gd
2. 101 pts, 90 gd
3. 99 pts, 103 gd
4. 100 pts, 90 gd
5. Running while I sleep.



It seems very stable and it got good results even in seasons with heavy injuries. Unless someone finds different results, I'll use 0.4b as base for Red 0.5, for my next planned tests.


Norwich seems weak in your tests, don't you think weaker teams should use a lower intensity?
@ZaZ Should we expect your new tactics with changes in the coming days? Did you hide your findings in the first post because they probably don't work anymore?
Eric said: I'd say any tactic that can get about 85 pts in my test with Tottenham is a very solid tactic... that's for sure.

Check plz ZaZ - Red 0.1 with Tottenham)
ZaZ said: Always change training for their roles, so they get maximum tactical familiarity. I also recommend individual training for quickness. They will complain about it, but ignore the complaints. =)

ZaZ, how much percentage of role 2Tf-at is better than roles 2Af-at?
ZaZ said: Probably not gonna have top tactic without maximum intensity. When you lower tempo, you lower you chance to win. You can use it to rest when match is already won, tough.

P.S.: Pass Into Space was one of the worst team instructions I tried. Avoid it like the plague.


What do you think of a higher defensive line? Big problems with conceded goals. Or maybe use tighter marking?
ZaZ said: Yet to try it.

Do your recommendations only relate to your tactics? Or do you talk about what works on this engine in any tactic?
ZaZ said: Blue 3.0 was the starting point, but it's not very good on FM22 beta. Now, the tactic has Very Attacking mentality, IW-At by the wings and AF-At at the front.

So, in the end, what to choose for the greatest efficiency? With two If-At and two AF-At? And what are the roles of the central midfielders?
And are you sure that the very attacking mentality is much better than the positive one in this beta?
Hey @Magician , how much do you think the hidden characteristics of players influence their quality and score in a match? Such as important matches, consistency, professionalism, etc. They are visible only with the help of the editor.