This is what I'm getting - Added the exclusions - Status is showing as done - winhttp.dll and BepInEx folder are in the same folder as fm.exe - Even added the .txt file in the BepInEx folder -
Panneton0 said: How long did you wait when rebooting FM26? For me, it took almost 10 minutes before it loaded for the first time after the installation. I just when out for a coffee instead of abandonning and it paid off
However, I'm no developper and @mavali can clearly support you way better than I do if the bug persists. On my end it worked like a charm :| Expand
I waited a while as I ended up going out yesterday afternoon, unfortunately, it still didn't work after being away for a few hours. I rebooted my laptop and still nothing. Followed the steps again in the FAQ this morning, acted on your advice, waited some time before loading FM but same result as yesterday. Shut the laptop down for a few hours and tried again but again same result
Panneton0 said: I bypassed windows security and inspected the raw code. It seems safe. It just doesn't have any certificate. Risk is very minimal. Expand
Thanks for the advice, managed to install it, but can't get it working. Followed the steps in the FAQs by adding the .txt file but still no luck. In fact, I rebooted FM and it wouldn't load until I deleted the .txt file
iezzex said: Pretty much every last 3430 got that 84.5 Ik there's different versions can be easily found But the topic is about diversity in latest retests Idk why no one tries to get the top scoring possesion based tactic for example and so on
Whats the point of getting those 343's tested if we alr know that its meta lmao Expand
I think you're missing the point, It's not about just testing the same shape, it's trying to find what else works. We're trying to push the limits of the ME. I've submitted different styles, different shapes etc.. but unfortunately they just don't stand up to the strikerless versions. I disagree that pretty much every last 3430 got 84.5, that simply isn't true. They do appear to be in a certain range however which is usually 80.0 to 84.5.
As previously stated, you are able to upload tactics, the testing isn't limited to certain people. Do you not think people have tried different styles or different shapes?
iezzex said: Also somewhat it doesnt work good in long saves somehow, or its something on my end no clue Heard about 2nd and next seasons issue, but didnt find any researches on it Expand
Again I disagree, I have had no issues with my long term saves using strikerless tactics. 2nd season syndrome hasn't happened for me this year, in fact, I'm finding that my 2nd season is better than the 1st but I'll put that down to recruitment
iezzex said: The subject is not that there's NO different shapes There is But almost 90% of latest tactics are pretty much same with 1-2 diff PI's etc Expand
People testing the strikerless with the 1-2 changes are trying to push the ME as much as possible, trying to figure out what works, what combinations work, what PIs work. For me, with testing, I am trying to figure out what combinations work and don't work. The average score isn't 84.5, that's the top score and by testing new PIs etc.. we can hopefully push that score a little bit more.
I understand the frustration with the retesting but there are loads of other shapes on here that can be found quite easily using the filters or specific tables
Irosabi said: On your second post you comment “ DLP to DM and CFD to CHF” is that correct ? And my question was can we leave CHF is instead of CFD ? Expand
That's me listing the changes I made to this tactic from a previous version
This is what I'm getting -
Added the exclusions -
Status is showing as done -
winhttp.dll and BepInEx folder are in the same folder as fm.exe -
Even added the .txt file in the BepInEx folder -
Unfortunately still no joy
However, I'm no developper and @mavali can clearly support you way better than I do if the bug persists. On my end it worked like a charm :|
I waited a while as I ended up going out yesterday afternoon, unfortunately, it still didn't work after being away for a few hours. I rebooted my laptop and still nothing. Followed the steps again in the FAQ this morning, acted on your advice, waited some time before loading FM but same result as yesterday. Shut the laptop down for a few hours and tried again but again same result
Thanks for the advice, managed to install it, but can't get it working. Followed the steps in the FAQs by adding the .txt file but still no luck. In fact, I rebooted FM and it wouldn't load until I deleted the .txt file
Ik there's different versions can be easily found
But the topic is about diversity in latest retests
Idk why no one tries to get the top scoring possesion based tactic for example and so on
Whats the point of getting those 343's tested if we alr know that its meta lmao
I think you're missing the point, It's not about just testing the same shape, it's trying to find what else works. We're trying to push the limits of the ME. I've submitted different styles, different shapes etc.. but unfortunately they just don't stand up to the strikerless versions. I disagree that pretty much every last 3430 got 84.5, that simply isn't true. They do appear to be in a certain range however which is usually 80.0 to 84.5.
As previously stated, you are able to upload tactics, the testing isn't limited to certain people. Do you not think people have tried different styles or different shapes?
iezzex said: Also somewhat it doesnt work good in long saves somehow, or its something on my end no clue
Heard about 2nd and next seasons issue, but didnt find any researches on it
Again I disagree, I have had no issues with my long term saves using strikerless tactics. 2nd season syndrome hasn't happened for me this year, in fact, I'm finding that my 2nd season is better than the 1st but I'll put that down to recruitment
There is
But almost 90% of latest tactics are pretty much same with 1-2 diff PI's etc
People testing the strikerless with the 1-2 changes are trying to push the ME as much as possible, trying to figure out what works, what combinations work, what PIs work. For me, with testing, I am trying to figure out what combinations work and don't work. The average score isn't 84.5, that's the top score and by testing new PIs etc.. we can hopefully push that score a little bit more.
I understand the frustration with the retesting but there are loads of other shapes on here that can be found quite easily using the filters or specific tables
That's me listing the changes I made to this tactic from a previous version
Sorry I can't make sense of what you're asking