ZaZ said: Got asked to make a 433 with advanced wingers, so there it is. I don't expect it to do very well, but it shouldn't be that bad either. Expand
@ZaZ , you always meet our expectations for outstanding tactics. thank you.
Egraam said: I'm still in the very early stages of figuring the game out (mainly because I've decided to play the game a little more casually this year) but I've had somewhat promising results with this one, so I thought I might share it. The set piece setup is the same as last year - most of the set pieces are from ZaZ Blue.
Expand
I want your back-three tactic, too Used Threedom V3 very well, either.
DST said: I am very grateful to you for this tactic. I am ABSOLUTELY delighted with this formation, I would love to play it all year. Hope it works well Expand
I think anything can be changed at any time depending on the remaining additional patches. I also hope this tactic works well to you. Thank you
I've tried quite a few forms of 3-4-3 with DWs, and this formation was most effective for me. (Of course, these are just the results of the Holiday test)
Perhaps only for Top Dogs, but Both Manchester United and Brentford's the number of the goals were overwhelming.
Jimmy said: I'd love to see some sort of 3-4-1-2 working with WCB (maybe on attack since support doesn't seem that great ?) and on the flanks maybe something else than WB-Su since it doesn't seem great there. But it's not like there is nothing else, we have CWB, IWB, … or maybe no WB but Defensive Wingers if it's not too attacking. Curious about that. Expand
I made a 3-4-1-2 one. but i don't know the way how effectively defended in this beta-engine.
The reason why Wolves was better than Tottenham is probably because of the presence of very fast wingers such as Adama Traore and Neto.
2. Result(holiday tested) :
3. PIs on AML and AMR
AML
AMR
Hi. It's my 4-2-3-1 for FM22.
When I set the width of the players' positions on the AMs differently, it was quite effective.
Most of the set-pieces follow Zaz's(thanks to Zaz)
@ZaZ , you always meet our expectations for outstanding tactics. thank you.
It's a very attacking back-three tactic. It gave me a great success. thank you.
** Most ot the set-pieces are from Zaz's(it's the best set-pieces i've used on FM22) **
I want your back-three tactic, too
Finally, I could achieve a Quadruple with Manchester City.
Both attack and defense are quite stable, so I think it will be effective for underdogs, too.
Interestingly, BBM moves like MEZ in this tactic.
This version also requires fast defenders and outstanding strikers.
From now on, I'll have to wait quietly for the results. thank you.
Thank you for your test! (What happened to MU?
I think anything can be changed at any time depending on the remaining additional patches. I also hope this tactic works well to you. Thank you
"Just cross and score goals!"
I made several attempts to make tactics that use WCBs to bring about great results. But most of them were either too defensive or too aggressive.
My previous tactic with DWs was very unstable, but I saw the possibility in terms of the aggression of the tactic.
And I can say that this tactic is much more stable.
If there are at least four outstanding strikers in the squad, I think they can perform well with this tactic.
(p.s. I want someone to give us key-factor to the back-three, not the boring back-four)
The main post of this thread does not include screenshots of tactics and results, only YouTube...
Isn't this one of the reasons you're looking for?
https://fm-arena.com/thread/1636-conte-ball-for-spurs-3412-target-foward-loves-af/
If you look at my previous post, I think you'll change your mind.
Paradoxically, giving overlapping instructions lowers DW's mentality.
MU got 106pts, and Brentford got 65pts!
I've tried quite a few forms of 3-4-3 with DWs, and this formation was most effective for me.
(Of course, these are just the results of the Holiday test)
Perhaps only for Top Dogs, but Both Manchester United and Brentford's the number of the goals were overwhelming.
Combination between Target Forward and Advanced forward is very satisfactory
Unfortunately, the only difference i found is that one with 'tighter marking' is more suitable for the top-dogs.
when it comes to the other problem, like difference between DWs and WBs(DM)
Regardless of what WBs' or DWs' mentality are, I also realized that they are essentially different in positioning when defense.
When i see the in-game positioning map after several tests, DW has never been in a lower position than WB when defense in any case.
If you add screenshots not links, it is likley to hear feedbacks!
Thank you!!
Taken together, many tests include yours reveal this tactic have quite a few loopholes in the backspace because it is too aggressive.
However, the TF-AF-SS trio's performance in all tests certainly seems to be outstanding!
The change to 'Balanced' mentality seems to be helpful now.
I also should test with many other changes.
I made a 3-4-1-2 one. but i don't know the way how effectively defended in this beta-engine.
It's amazing that this attacking tactic is defensively stable.
Maybe the creator is really Mourinho.
I'm testing a new one for underdogs which includes changes DWs to WBs(DM). I think it would be better for underdogs... thanks!