thischaiwat19 said: Thank you very much, I have another question. If I'm managing a team from the lower leagues to the top leagues, which plan should I use? Expand
Well... just use the Underdogs' on the top. It might be a little better to change DLP-de to DLP-su. but there are more aggressive, better tactics than this one.
thischaiwat19 said: I want you to come up with a game plan for a little delay. along with training files Expand
If you're worried about high intensity, use 'defensive, physical saving' version attached. but I recommend you use it only when your team keeps a solid lead by more than 2-3 goals.
On the other hand, if your team desperately need more goals during the game, use 'Very attacking' version attached.
About training session, I can only give you advice that you should use 'recovery' session properly when you face a tough schedule.
It's for Top-dogs. If you want to score more, feel free to use this tactic. (P.S. I'm super curious how Fulham got a UCL spot under the same conditions)
It will be my last tactic!! In the meantime, I have learned a lot of tips for FM21 while uploading my tactics at the Arena. I am very grateful that I have been offered those opportunities a lot
Placing supporting roles nearby, I intended for the Inside Forward to catch a lot of chances. I wanted to revive the undervalued IFs in the 21.4.0 patch.
I've referred to many popular tactics such as ZaZ and TANK 3-4-3. and also inspired by Johan Cruyff's Diamond 3-3-1-3 tactics.
Zippo said: Let's say you make a change CD->BPD in your tactic and offer it for testing but we have already tested that change in other different tactics many times and found that it didn't make any meaningful difference so it's highly unlikely we'll test that change once more. Expand
Oh, I got it. I may have had to be more careful . thank you.
We find 2-3 tactics with the same formation from one author is enough. You already have 6 tactics(4231) tested. In general, we want the number of tested tactics from one author to be reasonable and we find about 10 is enough and you've already got 16.
Also, the changes you offered for testing have been already tested many times and there's nothing new. We want to see people learn from what has been tested already and they don't start from a clean slate. I hope you understand. Expand
Thank you for the understandable explanation. I still haven't found another tactic exactly the same as this one, but I've now learned the exact meaning of the 'reasonable limits' of the above policy. I just thought that with good feedbacks, tactics would be tested for sure.
<Changes from v2> * Attacking Width : Very narrow -> Fairly wide * Added two Inverted Wingers * Added an Inverted Wingback * BPDs -> CDs * Some personal guidelines edited.
It did very well with not only Spurs, but also Leicester and ManCity
I did holiday-test with Spurs until January, and then played with proper rotation. Other teams were holiday tested thoroughout the season. Surprisingly, Leicester City won the PL with Body scoring 57 goals in the season. The better the striker, the better the tactic seems to be.
Below is the in-game positioning. The main attack route is to the left, where WB and IW link. On the right, the IWB enters the empty space where the MEZ penetrated.
Could you test this tactic? Thank you.
(The file attached to this post is a roaster that makes the probability of injury close to 0%. I'm using it when I run holiday tests. refer to it, if necessary.)
yaozy said: Such a great tactic for people who like 4-2-3-1 and striker scoring lots of goals Expand
Thank you
Iodine said: It really does seem promising. Quick question though, did any of you use any OI`s during your tests? Expand
I don't use OIs to Liar tactics that applied 'Mark firmly' personal guidelines to most players. However, Spurs tactics, which are not applied that personal guidelines to players, are delegated OIs to the head coach only in big games or against strong teams.
But I don't know exactly, because I haven't experimented with the influence of OI on the outcome of the game. It's only a theoretical idea.
You can find high-rated tactics in this link : https://fm-arena.com/table/11-patch-21-4-0/
You can also search in the order of tactics with low 'Goals Against Per Match' : https://fm-arena.com/table/11-patch-21-4-0/?order=ga#options
I hope you can find the right tactic for your team.
I've set up the same settings as IWB(inverted-wingback) to FB.
Is there anyone who can give me feedback after use this tactic?
Well... just use the Underdogs' on the top. It might be a little better to change DLP-de to DLP-su. but there are more aggressive, better tactics than this one.
If you're worried about high intensity, use 'defensive, physical saving' version attached. but I recommend you use it only when your team keeps a solid lead by more than 2-3 goals.
On the other hand, if your team desperately need more goals during the game, use 'Very attacking' version attached.
About training session, I can only give you advice that you should use 'recovery' session properly when you face a tough schedule.
It's for Top-dogs. If you want to score more, feel free to use this tactic.
(P.S. I'm super curious how Fulham got a UCL spot under the same conditions)
It's quite promising for underdogs!
This tactic seems appropriate for teams with fast strikers and direct counterattacks.
It did very well with Southampton in my game, finished 4th in first season.
It will be my last tactic!! In the meantime, I have learned a lot of tips for FM21 while uploading my tactics at the Arena. I am very grateful that I have been offered those opportunities a lot
Placing supporting roles nearby, I intended for the Inside Forward to catch a lot of chances.
I wanted to revive the undervalued IFs in the 21.4.0 patch.
I've referred to many popular tactics such as ZaZ and TANK 3-4-3. and also inspired by Johan Cruyff's Diamond 3-3-1-3 tactics.
Thank you.
Oh, I got it. I may have had to be more careful
We find 2-3 tactics with the same formation from one author is enough. You already have 6 tactics(4231) tested.
Also, the changes you offered for testing have been already tested many times and there's nothing new. We want to see people learn from what has been tested already and they don't start from a clean slate. I hope you understand.
Thank you for the understandable explanation.
I just thought that with good feedbacks, tactics would be tested for sure.
The way to pick the tactics of this site is too ambigious, i think. Can anyone explain why this much-changed tactic has not been tested again?
I tried not to do "brute-force cracking". but have I been too active in this quiet forum recently? I'm really curious.
I've added a Spurs v3 tactic here!
<Changes from v2>
* Attacking Width : Very narrow -> Fairly wide
* Added two Inverted Wingers
* Added an Inverted Wingback
* BPDs -> CDs
* Some personal guidelines edited.
It did very well with not only Spurs, but also Leicester and ManCity
I did holiday-test with Spurs until January, and then played with proper rotation.
Other teams were holiday tested thoroughout the season. Surprisingly, Leicester City won the PL with Body scoring 57 goals in the season. The better the striker, the better the tactic seems to be.
Below is the in-game positioning.
The main attack route is to the left, where WB and IW link.
On the right, the IWB enters the empty space where the MEZ penetrated.
Could you test this tactic?
Thank you.
(The file attached to this post is a roaster that makes the probability of injury close to 0%. I'm using it when I run holiday tests. refer to it, if necessary.)
How about this?
The winger's preferred foot is not so important in this formation, i think. and I don't prefer a player who is too rough and slow like Maguire.
Could you tell me what would be the best starting eleven for Man Utd with this tactic?
Thanks.
which tactic do you mean? v1 or v3
Thank you
Iodine said: It really does seem promising.
Quick question though, did any of you use any OI`s during your tests?
I don't use OIs to Liar tactics that applied 'Mark firmly' personal guidelines to most players. However, Spurs tactics, which are not applied that personal guidelines to players, are delegated OIs to the head coach only in big games or against strong teams.
But I don't know exactly, because I haven't experimented with the influence of OI on the outcome of the game. It's only a theoretical idea.
I'm looking forward to your screenshots
Thanks to good feedbacks such as your comment, I hope my Spurs V2 can be tested.
Based on ZaZ's main guidelines(including set pieces), 4-2-3-1 2DM tactic using inverted wingers.
Could you test this tactic?