Wigo said: unfortunatly you are wrong mate :/ after fm-arena tests i create a team for my own test and i made 2 strikers and 2 wingers... all 4 players has Finishing 1, technique 1, passing 1, off the ball 1, but has 20 acceleration, 20 pace, 20 dribbling, 20 jumping reach, 20 stamina, 20 work rate... and gues what? strikers got 35+ goals in 38 games and wingers got around 23 assists and 18+ goals Expand
I still think these evaluations may be a little meaningless.
I would like to introduce you to Quarcoo. This friend of ours is both a professional athlete and football player. It has been in the game for a few years. His pace and acceleration value in the game is 20. Except for flair, all his technical and mental attributes are almost below 6. I tried this player on FM 22 and it was very bad. He could not be effective in any tactic. The team I tried out for was a team from the lowest leagues.
Lapidus said: Because there's always 1-2 points RNG and if it gets a lower score than the default attributes then it means that the impact from increasing Technique attribute is so small that it even can't beat the RNG. Expand
1200 matches are played. I remember that with this new test league method, which was changed in the middle of last year, the RNG factor decreased by 1 point. This conclusion felt so pointless.
Has to be exactly the same as above. 'Box' needs to go to C1 - set Creator as second most important after taker. May need to switch C1/C2 around a little to get it right both sides. LB as LC, RB as RC. Expand
lol
I would like to introduce you to Quarcoo. This friend of ours is both a professional athlete and football player. It has been in the game for a few years. His pace and acceleration value in the game is 20. Except for flair, all his technical and mental attributes are almost below 6. I tried this player on FM 22 and it was very bad. He could not be effective in any tactic. The team I tried out for was a team from the lowest leagues.
By the way, Quarcoo's features: https://fminside.net/players/4-fm-24/53181785-jonathan-quarcoo
Wiki: https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Jonathan_Quarcoo
In summary, I remain skeptical about these feature tests.
This makes things even more ridiculous.
1200 matches are played. I remember that with this new test league method, which was changed in the middle of last year, the RNG factor decreased by 1 point. This conclusion felt so pointless.
Changes
Wingers go SS's
With these tactic, I tried to reflect the formation that Xabi Alonso plays in Bayer Leverkusen.
Holiday test results
You're right, I confused it. A momentary distraction.
Which tactic would you usually base on with the most points? Why this tactic this year? Is it because it is one of the most used formations?
Edit: What I actually meant was determination.
Changes
DM(su) > MEZ(su)
WB(R,at) > IWB(R,at)
Holiday test results
Has to be exactly the same as above. 'Box' needs to go to C1 - set Creator as second most important after taker. May need to switch C1/C2 around a little to get it right both sides. LB as LC, RB as RC.
Can you use save load instead of screenshot?