ZaZ said: It actually follows this kind of curve below. The peak, zero, is the exact point where it changes from "Fresh" to "Low", so the ideal is to stay in that point of balance.
Anyway, I am still collecting more data to consolidate those results, as well as checking the changes in numbers caused by playing and training. Expand
Incredible Zaz, keep this work on, always follow your good advice and vision.
Yarema said: I didn't say it's worthless. But people expect massive changes because of it and it is simply not true in practice. From my experience you can get maybe 1-2 additional points in the selected attributes over the course of whole career. If you are lucky. Some focuses work better than others, some I'd argue don't even work. Expand
To be honest, my individual training is always on QUICKNESS, PACE AND ACC are beast, no need to improve something else, i'm agree there is no need to work a lot on this part. And don't forget if you haven't a good note in Professional, you can forget all expectations.
BadA said: @Falbravv I'm pretty sure natural fitness was tested and found to have no effect on the degradation of stats due to age whatsoever. I don't remember where I heard/read it, but I remember it was from a reliable source (Mark or ZaZ here or EBFM maybe). Expand
I think you're right, to be honest i just check my key notes, when they start to be smaller than a young prospect, it's finish for my player lol
Yarema said: I feel like individual training is vastly overrated or rather people obsess with it way too much. The effects really aren't that large. You won't get someone with 6 positioning to 16 over the course of his career because of it. He'll naturally go from 6 to lets say 11 just with GK/SK training, and if you put him on individual training that involves positioning throughout his whole career you might get him to 12 or 13. All of these numbers apply for a guy from intake with great development and high potential. If you buy him at 18, develops less than ideally and/or just doesn't have elite potential you can easily half the numbers. Expand
Totally agree with that, you have a player with some notes, these notes have a potential, and you can do what you want, the road is already done for him.
The PA will be reach if Professional and AMbitions are enough, and if the age is not so old.
Need to see AGE, NOTE, or other parameters. To be honest i've never seen something like you, if my player is in age to develop, and have a nice prof/amb, it develops like always
ta2199 said: Hi, I just want to confirm about that because I have found out why some of my player doesn't increase his CA entire season. I was using different training from ZAZ, Kinito and EBTS and using automatic rest (only normal intensity for full health players). And the weird things is while most of the team is doing fine. Some players won't increase a single point or just 1 point even though they was playing like 30 matches per season and base on the point in the OP they should be improve and It was making me really frustrate. And just recently I found out that this is because I set no intensity player on good and ok condition players. They didn't participate in training. So to solved this you just need to manually set that player who having problem improving his attributes to normal intensity. I think many other people is also facing this issue because on page 2 or page 3 there is already a guy asking about this. Expand
Very strange because i use EvidenceBF, i use automatic rest like you, and i have no problem with development. The training is only a part of the development, if your player have a bad combinaison of professionalism and ambition, it's totally logical to not develop.
Middleweight165 said: This is what I am trying to understand. Why would I choose Marks over just focusing on the key attributes? What approach is that? More realistic or better? Expand
To be honest, it's not better. But it's more realistic because you follow more attributes.
Second point to be honnest, it was said a lot of time here, if you made a Rating which include Pace, Acc, Anticipation and 4-5 good attributes, you will find top players for the META, not for the general game.
In my Rating Haaland is 10 points ahead form the rest, it seems always realistic
Middleweight165 said: @Mark I'm still using your ratings for GS. Would you change anything to your ratings? Could you explain in laymans terms how your ratings work? What is the benefit of me using your ratings and not just focusing on those top key attributes identified here? Expand
If you want to follow key attributes, you don't need multiples ratings. For example, i made my own GS rating only with 9-10 attributes, and it gives me great results. The aim is to give energy on top key attributes.
If you want to play the game with a different approach, with all the attributes (but some of them are 100% useless), take Mark GS to find players.
Pumpkin said: that's with no automatic resting those three sessions are the most three effective sessions and the more a player trains the more impact they get from training Expand
Some tests give proofs that's not the reality. I have a 100% development with a light schedule, and players fit for matches.
It's not my work, it's the fantastic work of Youtubers.
Anyway, I am still collecting more data to consolidate those results, as well as checking the changes in numbers caused by playing and training.
Incredible Zaz, keep this work on, always follow your good advice and vision.
To be honest, my individual training is always on QUICKNESS, PACE AND ACC are beast, no need to improve something else, i'm agree there is no need to work a lot on this part.
And don't forget if you haven't a good note in Professional, you can forget all expectations.
I think you're right, to be honest i just check my key notes, when they start to be smaller than a young prospect, it's finish for my player lol
Totally agree with that, you have a player with some notes, these notes have a potential, and you can do what you want, the road is already done for him.
The PA will be reach if Professional and AMbitions are enough, and if the age is not so old.
Other things are totally useless.
But will buy it
I just want to confirm about that because I have found out why some of my player doesn't increase his CA entire season.
I was using different training from ZAZ, Kinito and EBTS and using automatic rest (only normal intensity for full health players). And the weird things is while most of the team is doing fine. Some players won't increase a single point or just 1 point even though they was playing like 30 matches per season and base on the point in the OP they should be improve and It was making me really frustrate.
And just recently I found out that this is because I set no intensity player on good and ok condition players. They didn't participate in training.
So to solved this you just need to manually set that player who having problem improving his attributes to normal intensity. I think many other people is also facing this issue because on page 2 or page 3 there is already a guy asking about this.
Very strange because i use EvidenceBF, i use automatic rest like you, and i have no problem with development. The training is only a part of the development, if your player have a bad combinaison of professionalism and ambition, it's totally logical to not develop.
I mean how to slow down the fall of pace and acceleration attributes as much as possible. What player parameters affect this?
I don't want to make a mistake, but IMO the key attributes is NATURAL FITNESS, it slow down the effects
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/msqjptnvsq23zf33hxa4p/Flo.grf?rlkey=bo0at2nn09zirnv2s9npaw9r8&dl=0
To be honest, it's not better. But it's more realistic because you follow more attributes.
Second point to be honnest, it was said a lot of time here, if you made a Rating which include Pace, Acc, Anticipation and 4-5 good attributes, you will find top players for the META, not for the general game.
In my Rating Haaland is 10 points ahead form the rest, it seems always realistic
If you want to follow key attributes, you don't need multiples ratings.
For example, i made my own GS rating only with 9-10 attributes, and it gives me great results.
The aim is to give energy on top key attributes.
If you want to play the game with a different approach, with all the attributes (but some of them are 100% useless), take Mark GS to find players.
Some tests give proofs that's not the reality. I have a 100% development with a light schedule, and players fit for matches.
It's not my work, it's the fantastic work of Youtubers.
Absolutely not. Too much sessions, 7 are the max to be most effective.