Middleweight165 said: Why do you think the balanced filter leads to misinformation? Expand
because for me (based on all the informations here and my experience), some attributes are clearly more important, and i don't want to have a player with a good rating because he is medium in all atributes, i prefer a player with a good note in a very important attribute, even if he is bad on the other. I know filters are made to give an overall view, but i love Zaz filter with minus for this reason.
I've read it all, many times, here and on other sites, I'm passionate about the work done by the members here, but I have a simple request. My way of looking for players on Genie Scout is as follows: I use the 50 minus 25 zaz balanced by Mark, as I much prefer a filter that maximizes important attributes rather than a balance that can lead to misinformation. Now I encounter a problem with this magnificent filter: I would like to have the raw rating (general rating) which does not modify the rating according to the affinity with the position. Because I want to be able to manage this problem on my side and decide to teach the player the new position. But I would like the general note to come out directly, I find it easier to find players who can stick to several positions. I hope my request is clear, and if this filter already exists, I apologize, I'm not English and I may have missed a subtlety.
thank you again for the exceptional and exciting work done here.
Edit: i haven't mentionned that maybe the problem is the choice of column in my GS, but i haven't find a column which gave me this General Note without balance of positionning.
Zaz, i've a problem I'm using asymetric tweak, because when i switch to 3.2 or today 3.3, i find my team really less efficient. No goals, hard to win... You tlak a lot about set pieces improvement, the fact is, my players are generally worse for throws, corner etc... is it an answer of bad form when using 3.3, which is logically better than asymetric tweak ?
You say it doesn't work, but all results are not so good. With West Ham i can win EPL with Zaz Blue, it's not against you, but trust the table, you're not at this level. These guyz try hard to obtain such nice result, your tactic is good, but keep working !
because for me (based on all the informations here and my experience), some attributes are clearly more important, and i don't want to have a player with a good rating because he is medium in all atributes, i prefer a player with a good note in a very important attribute, even if he is bad on the other. I know filters are made to give an overall view, but i love Zaz filter with minus for this reason.
I've read it all, many times, here and on other sites, I'm passionate about the work done by the members here, but I have a simple request.
My way of looking for players on Genie Scout is as follows: I use the 50 minus 25 zaz balanced by Mark, as I much prefer a filter that maximizes important attributes rather than a balance that can lead to misinformation.
Now I encounter a problem with this magnificent filter: I would like to have the raw rating (general rating) which does not modify the rating according to the affinity with the position.
Because I want to be able to manage this problem on my side and decide to teach the player the new position. But I would like the general note to come out directly, I find it easier to find players who can stick to several positions.
I hope my request is clear, and if this filter already exists, I apologize, I'm not English and I may have missed a subtlety.
thank you again for the exceptional and exciting work done here.
Edit: i haven't mentionned that maybe the problem is the choice of column in my GS, but i haven't find a column which gave me this General Note without balance of positionning.
I'm using asymetric tweak, because when i switch to 3.2 or today 3.3, i find my team really less efficient. No goals, hard to win... You tlak a lot about set pieces improvement, the fact is, my players are generally worse for throws, corner etc... is it an answer of bad form when using 3.3, which is logically better than asymetric tweak ?
Tx a lot for the work, and for the answer
These guyz try hard to obtain such nice result, your tactic is good, but keep working !
have a nice day